Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31250379›Full record

ArticleMusculoskeletal surgery2020

The subacromial balloon spacer for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: approximately 3 years of prospective follow-up.

R S M Piekaar, I C E Bouman, P M van Kampen, F van Eijk, P E Huijsmans

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Treatment Options for Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2021
    Review
  12. Subacromial balloon spacer - Where are we now?Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R S M PiekaarThe Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, OLVG, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. roderickpiekaar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5671-0322
I C E BoumanThe Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haga Hospital The Hague, Sportlaan 600, 2566 MJ, The Hague, The Netherlands.
P M van KampenThe Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bergman Clinics, Laan van Oversteen 20, 2289 CX, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
F van EijkThe Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bergman Clinics, Laan van Oversteen 20, 2289 CX, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
P E HuijsmansThe Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bergman Clinics, Laan van Oversteen 20, 2289 CX, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
Bergman Clinics · NLHaga Hospital · NLOLVG · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIrreparable rotator cuff tears (RCT) are still a challenging problem. RCT can result in disability and severe pain. The optimal treatment for this disabling and painful diagnosis remains controversial. The arthroscopic implantation of a biodegradable subacromial balloon spacer is a possible treatment option. In this prospective study, we evaluate the clinical outcome of this balloon spacer after approximately 3 years.

methodsBetween March 2014 and December 2015, the biodegradable balloon spacer was implanted into the subacromial space of 46 shoulders of 44 patients with massive irreparable RCT. Pain was evaluated using a numeric rating scale (NRS), and functional outcome was evaluated using the Oxford shoulder score (OSS). Patients were followed prospectively for approximately 3 years. This present study focuses on the comparison between the early and the midterm results up to approximately 3 years.

resultsAll patients were treated by surgical implantation of the subacromial balloon spacer. The comparison between the outcomes of the NRS and the OSS after one and 3 years was made and showed no mutual significant differences, respectively, p = 0.61 and p = 0.08. Significant pain reduction and functional improvement was noticed postoperatively and maintained after approximately 3 years. At last follow-up (mean: 34 months), pain was reduced to a NRS of 3.09 points (95% CI: 2.17-4.01). Functional outcome based on the OSS improved significantly from 21.32 preoperatively to 34.39 (95% CI: 29.17-36.70) at the last follow-up. Correction for estimated confounders did not show significant differences. 82% of the patients were satisfied with the outcome after implantation of the subacromial balloon spacer. No surgical or postoperative medical complications due to implantation of the balloon spacer were reported.

conclusionsArthroscopic implantation of the biodegradable balloon spacer in the subacromial space is a safe and minimally invasive intervention. It leads to significant reduction in pain and significant improvement of functional daily activities in patients with irreparable RCT during 3 years of follow-up starting postoperative and maintain over time beyond device degradation. A high percentage of patients are satisfied postoperatively. Despite of these positive results after 3 years of follow-up, the specific contribution of the balloon needs further investigation.

Indexed as

Absorbable ImplantsAgedArthroscopyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of FunctionRotator Cuff InjuriesSeverity of Illness IndexShoulder PainTreatment OutcomeArthroscopic surgeryBalloon spacerFunctional outcomeMassive rotator cuff tearPain reductionSubacromial spacer

Identifiers

PMID31250379
OpenAlexW2953397360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.