Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31250239›Full record

Trial reportMaternal and child health journal2020

A Novel 4D Ultrasound Parenting Intervention for Substance Using Pregnant Women in Finland: Participation in Obstetric Care, Fetal Drug Exposure, and Perinatal Outcomes in a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Heidi Jussila, Marjukka Pajulo, Eeva Ekholm

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Maternal and child health journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03413631 (A Prenatal Mentalization-focused 4D Ultrasound and a Pregnancy Diary Intervention for Substance-abusing Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03413631 nacompletednot on this map

A Prenatal Mentalization-focused 4D Ultrasound and a Pregnancy Diary Intervention for Substance-abusing Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorTurku University HospitalRan2011 to 2015Enrolled126ConditionsSubstance-Related Disorders, Pregnancy, High Risk, Prenatal Care, Maternal-Fetal RelationsArmsPrenatal mentalization intervention, Prenatal obstetric treatment as usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Heidi JussilaDoctoral Programme of Clinical Investigation, Department of Child Psychiatry, University of Turku, 20014, Turku, Finland. hemhaan@utu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2744-5264
Marjukka PajuloDepartment of Child Psychiatry and The FinnBrain, University of Turku, 20014, Turku, Finland.
Eeva EkholmDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, PL 52, 20521, Turku, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of the study was to explore the effect of a new prenatal intervention on participation in obstetric care, fetal drug exposure, and perinatal outcomes among substance using pregnant women in Finland.

methodsThe participants were 90 women referred to a hospital obstetric outpatient clinic due to current or recent substance use. The intervention group (n = 46) was offered three interactive ultrasounds at 24, 30 and 34 gestational weeks and a pregnancy diary accompanied by three prenatal infant mental health consultations. The intervention elements were designed to enhance parental mentalization and prenatal attachment. A randomized control group (n = 44) design was used. All participants were offered treatment-as-usual in the obstetric tertiary setting. Medical record data and meconium toxicology were analyzed.

resultsThe retention rate in the whole sample was 89%. Retention was higher in the intervention group (96% vs. 82%, p < 0.05), of which 74% attended all three ultrasound sessions. However, the pregnant women in the intervention group participated less often in all the scheduled obstetric standard care visits (59% vs. 83%, p = 0.02). Fetal drug exposure and perinatal outcomes were similar in both groups. Within the whole sample, 13% of the neonates were preterm, 12% small for gestational age and 7% had exposure to drugs. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Retention in the intervention was very good. Watching the fetus with parenting focus seemed to motivate these high-risk women. Interestingly, the pregnant women in the intervention group tended to prefer the intervention sessions to the routine care. Clinical implications of this finding are discussed. TRIAL REGISTRY: The trial registration number in ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03413631.

Indexed as

Object AttachmentAdultFemaleFinlandHumansMother-Child RelationsMothersPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsSubstance-Related DisordersUltrasonography, PrenatalInterventionPregnancyPrenatal careSubstance use disorderUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID31250239
PMCPMC6957471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.