Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31250202›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2019

Updates on the Genetic Paradigm in Heart Failure.

Andrew N Rosenbaum, Naveen Pereira

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew N RosenbaumDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Naveen PereiraDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Pereira.Naveen@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe rapidly evolving field of cardiovascular genetics has already improved the care of patients with heart failure and families. The purpose of the current review is to describe the most and provide the most pertinent updates in the field of heart failure genetics. RECENT

findingsRecent advanced in heart failure genetics have begun to not only increase the yield of testing through improving technology and use of whole exome or whole genome screening, but also enabled the improving technology and increasing use of whole exome or whole genome screening, but also enabled an enhanced understanding of the implications of results of genetic testing. For instance, new data have described differential responses to heart failure therapies based on genetic testing. Additionally, variant analysis by locus in genetic cardiomyopathies has facilitated a much-improved prognostic understanding of phenotype. Recent years have seen advancements in the understanding of the genetics of rare disorders, including pediatric-onset cardiomyopathies, previously under-investigated; restrictive cardiomyopathies; and non-compaction cardiomyopathy. The last few years have heralded not only a broader understanding of the scope of the genetics of heart failure, but have also provided notable leaps in mechanistic and prognostic understanding, which will serve as the foundation for clinical investigation and future genetic variant assessment.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathyCardiovascular diseaseHeart failureHeart failure geneticsUpdatesVariants

Identifiers

PMID31250202
OpenAlexW2954818351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.