Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31250188›Full record

ArticleOecologia2019

Drift-kelp suppresses foraging movement of overgrazing sea urchins.

N Kriegisch, S E Reeves, E B Flukes, C R Johnson, S D Ling

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Kelp-forest dynamics controlled by substrate complexity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N KriegischInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, 20 Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, TAS, 7004, Australia.
S E ReevesInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, 20 Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, TAS, 7004, Australia.
E B FlukesInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, 20 Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, TAS, 7004, Australia.
C R JohnsonInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, 20 Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, TAS, 7004, Australia.
S D LingInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, 20 Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, TAS, 7004, Australia. Scott.Ling@utas.edu.au.
University of Tasmania · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council DP170104668Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, State Government of Victoria RR34_313204Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment 104121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sea urchins have the capacity to destructively overgraze kelp beds and cause a wholesale shift to an alternative and stable 'urchin barren' reef state. However, destructive grazing appears labile and contingent on behavioural shift. Changes in supply of allochthonous 'drift-kelp' food are hypothesised as a trigger of change in urchin grazing behaviour, yet field tests are lacking. Here we conduct a suite of in situ behavioural surveys and manipulative experiments within kelp beds and on urchin barrens to examine foraging movements and evidence for a behavioural switch to an 'overgrazing mode' by the Australian urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma (Echinometridae). Tracking urchins using time-lapse photography revealed urchin foraging to conform to a random walk model within kelp beds and on barrens. However, many individuals tended towards local movement within proximal crevices and movement was reduced in kelp beds compared to barrens. Directional movement of urchins toward newly available kelp was experimentally inducible, consistent with locally observed 'mobile-feeding-fronts' that develop at barrens-kelp interfaces. Habitat-specific feeding modes were also evidenced by herbivory assays which revealed urchin grazing rates to be high on both drift-kelp and standing kelp on barren grounds, while drift-kelp but not standing kelp was consumed at high rates within kelp beds. Time-lapse tracking of urchin foraging before/after addition of drift-kelp revealed a reduction in foraging across the reef surface after drift-kelp capture. Collectively, results indicate that the availability of drift-kelp is a pivotal trigger in determining urchin feeding modes which thus mediates the shift between alternative stable states for rocky reef ecosystems.

Indexed as

KelpAnimalsAustraliaEcosystemFood ChainSea UrchinsForaging behaviourKelp bedsMovementRegime-shiftUrchin barrens

Identifiers

PMID31250188
OpenAlexW2954911158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.