Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31250170›Full record

ReviewEuropean radiology2019

Diagnosis of peripheral bone and prosthetic joint infections: overview on the consensus documents by the EANM, EBJIS, and ESR (with ESCMID endorsement).

Luca Maria Sconfienza, Alberto Signore, Victor Cassar-Pullicino, Maria Adriana Cataldo, Olivier Gheysens, Olivier Borens, Andrej Trampuz, Klaus Wörtler, Nicola Petrosillo, Heinz Winkler and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The presence of a positive blood culture should be regarded a risk factor for DAIR failure in cases of haematogenous total knee arthroplasty infection.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Pilot Evaluation of S-(3-[Molecular imaging and biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection: a Scoping Review.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The Role of Nuclear Medicine Imaging withDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Luca Maria SconfienzaIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy. io@lucasconfienza.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0759-8431
Alberto SignoreNuclear Medicine Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy.
Victor Cassar-PullicinoDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire, UK.
Maria Adriana CataldoInfectious Disease Unit, National Institute for Infectious Diseases "L. Spallanzani", IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Olivier GheysensDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Olivier BorensDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Septic surgical unit, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Andrej TrampuzCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Klaus WörtlerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Nicola PetrosilloInfectious Disease Unit, National Institute for Infectious Diseases "L. Spallanzani", IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Heinz WinklerOsteitis-Centre, Privatklinik Döbling, Vienna, Austria.
Filip M H M VanhoenackerDepartment of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital and Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium.
Paul C JutteDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Andor W J M GlaudemansDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Istituto Nazionale per le Malattie Infettive Lazzaro Spallanzani · ITUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLGhent University Hospital · BEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEKU Leuven · BERobert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital · GBSapienza University of Rome · ITTUM Klinikum · DEUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPeripheral bone infection (PBI) and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) are two different infectious conditions of the musculoskeletal system. They have in common to be quite challenging to be diagnosed and no clear diagnostic flowchart has been established. Thus, a conjoined initiative on these two topics has been initiated by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID). The purpose of this work is to provide an overview on the two consensus documents on PBI and PJI that originated by the conjoined work of the ESR, EANM, and EBJIS (with ESCMID endorsement). METHODS AND

resultsAfter literature search, a list of 18 statements for PBI and 25 statements for PJI were drafted in consensus on the most debated diagnostic challenges on these two topics, with emphasis on imaging.

conclusionsOverall, white blood cell scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging have individually demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance over other imaging modalities for the diagnosis of PBI and PJI. However, the choice of which advanced diagnostic modality to use first depends on several factors, such as the benefit for the patient, local experience of imaging specialists, costs, and availability. Since robust, comparative studies among most tests do not exist, the proposed flowcharts are based not only on existing literature but also on the opinion of multiple experts involved on these topics. KEY POINTS: • For peripheral bone infection and prosthetic joint infection, white blood cell and magnetic resonance imaging have individually demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance over other imaging modalities. • Two evidence- and expert-based diagnostic flowcharts involving variable combination of laboratory tests, biopsy methods, and radiological and nuclear medicine imaging modalities are proposed by a multi-society expert panel. • Clinical application of these flowcharts depends on several factors, such as the benefit for the patient, local experience, costs, and availability.

Indexed as

Bone Diseases, InfectiousEuropeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingProsthesis-Related InfectionsRadionuclide ImagingSocieties, MedicalClinical laboratory techniquesNuclear medicineOsteomyelitisProsthesis-related infectionsRadiology

Identifiers

PMID31250170
OpenAlexW2954920942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.