Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31250149›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2020

Pituitary adenomas and neuropsychological status: a systematic literature review.

Marta Pertichetti, Simona Serioli, Francesco Belotti, Davide Mattavelli, Alberto Schreiber, Carlo Cappelli, Alessandro Padovani, Roberto Gasparotti, Piero Nicolai, Marco M Fontanella and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marta PertichettiUnit of Neurosurgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Largo Spedali Civili, 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Simona SerioliUnit of Neurosurgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Largo Spedali Civili, 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Francesco BelottiUnit of Neurosurgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Largo Spedali Civili, 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Davide MattavelliUnit of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Alberto SchreiberUnit of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Carlo CappelliUnit of Endocrinology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Alessandro PadovaniUnit of Neurology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Roberto GasparottiUnit of Neuroradiology, Department of Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Piero NicolaiUnit of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Marco M FontanellaUnit of Neurosurgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Largo Spedali Civili, 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Francesco DogliettoUnit of Neurosurgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Largo Spedali Civili, 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy. francesco.doglietto@unibs.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7438-0734
University of Brescia · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · IT

Funding

Università degli Studi di Brescia (BR) 9701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurocognitive and psychological dysfunctions associated with pituitary adenomas (PAs) are clinically relevant, though probably under-reported. The aim of the current review is to provide an update on neuropsychological status, psychopathology, and perceived quality of life (QoL) in patients with PAs. A systematic research was performed in PubMed and Scopus in order to identify reports on neurocognitive, psychiatric, and psychological disorders in PAs. Prevalence of alterations, QoL evaluation, and used tests were also recorded. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Of 62,448 identified articles, 102 studies were included in the systematic review. The prevalence of neurocognitive dysfunctions was 15-83% in Cushing's Disease (CD), 2-33% in acromegaly, mostly affecting memory and attention. Memory was altered in 22% of nonfunctioning (NF) PAs. Worsened QoL was reported in 40% of CD patients. The prevalence of psychiatric disorders in CD reached 77% and in acromegaly 63%, mostly involving depression, followed by psychosis, and anxiety. The prevalence of psychopathology was up to 83% in CD, and 35% in acromegaly. Postoperative improvement in patients with CD was observed for: learning processes, overall memory, visuospatial skills, and language skills. Short-term memory and psychomotor speed improved in NFPAs. Postoperative improvement of QoL, somatic symptoms, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and coping strategies was seen in CD and acromegaly. Reports after radiotherapy are discordant. There is wide variability in used tests. PAs have been recently shown to be associated with altered neurocognitive and neuropsychological functions, as well as QoL. These data suggest the importance of a multidisciplinary evaluation for an optimal management.

Indexed as

Cognition DisordersHumansNeuropsychological TestsPituitary NeoplasmsQuality of LifeCognitive functionsHealth statusNeuropsychologyPituitary adenomaPsychopathologyQuality of lifeSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31250149
OpenAlexW2955111280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.