Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31250131›Full record

Observational studyHeart and vessels2020

Optical coherence tomography characteristics of in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation: a novel classification and its clinical significance.

Wataru Yamamoto, Kenichi Fujii, Satoru Otsuji, Shin Takiuchi, Mikio Kakishita, Motoaki Ibuki, Katsuyuki Hasegawa, Kasumi Ishibuchi, Hiroto Tamaru, Shingo Yasuda and 4 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Heart and vessels, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Prevalence and outcomes of stent thrombosis with in-stent calcified nodules: substudy from the REAL-ST registry.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Optical coherence tomography: fundamentals and clinical utility.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020
    Review
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Wataru YamamotoDepartment of Cardiology, Higashi Takarazuka Satoh Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, 6650873, Japan.
Kenichi FujiiDepartment of Cardiology, Higashi Takarazuka Satoh Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, 6650873, Japan. fujiik@hirakata.kmu.ac.jp.
Satoru OtsujiDepartment of Cardiology, Higashi Takarazuka Satoh Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, 6650873, Japan.
Shin TakiuchiDepartment of Cardiology, Higashi Takarazuka Satoh Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, 6650873, Japan.
Mikio KakishitaDepartment of Cardiology, Higashi Takarazuka Satoh Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, 6650873, Japan.
Motoaki IbukiDepartment of Cardiology, Higashi Takarazuka Satoh Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, 6650873, Japan.
Katsuyuki HasegawaDepartment of Cardiology, Higashi Takarazuka Satoh Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, 6650873, Japan.
Kasumi IshibuchiDepartment of Cardiology, Higashi Takarazuka Satoh Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, 6650873, Japan.
Hiroto TamaruDepartment of Cardiology, Higashi Takarazuka Satoh Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, 6650873, Japan.
Shingo YasudaDepartment of Cardiology, Higashi Takarazuka Satoh Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, 6650873, Japan.
Rui IshiiDepartment of Cardiology, Higashi Takarazuka Satoh Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, 6650873, Japan.
Sho NakabayashiDepartment of Cardiology, Higashi Takarazuka Satoh Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, 6650873, Japan.
Hirofumi KusumotoDepartment of Cardiology, Higashi Takarazuka Satoh Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, 6650873, Japan.
Yorihiko HigashinoDepartment of Cardiology, Higashi Takarazuka Satoh Hospital, Takarazuka, Hyogo, 6650873, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to establish a novel classification of in-stent restenosis (ISR) morphological characteristics after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation as visualized by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and determine its clinical significance. A total of 133 lesions with intrastent restenosis after DES implantation were imaged by OCT. Neointimal tissue characteristics were categorized according to the classical classification as either homogeneous, heterogeneous, or layered. Then all tissues were also classified into six types as follows: homogeneous high-intensity tissue (type I), heterogeneous tissue with signal attenuation (type II), speckled heterogeneous tissue (type III), heterogeneous tissue containing poorly delineated region with invisible strut (type IV), heterogeneous tissue containing sharply delineated low-intensity region (type V), or bright protruding tissue with an irregular surface (type VI). The kappa value for interobserver agreement between the two observers was higher in the modified classification than in the classical classification (0.97 and 0.72, respectively). Most lesions classified as type V and VI were likely to be identified in patients on hemodialysis and located at the ostial right coronary artery. The duration from stent implantation to ISR was significantly longer in types IV and VI than in others. The incidence of stent fracture was significantly higher in types I and IV. This new modified classification enabled us to classify most ISR lesions easily with higher reproducibility. The clinical significance of neointimal restenotic tissue classification by OCT became clear while using the modified classification.

Indexed as

Drug-Eluting StentsNeointimaTomography, Optical CoherenceAgedAged, 80 and overCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary RestenosisCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsClassificationsDrug-eluting stentIn-stent restenosisOptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.