Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31250124›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2019

Advanced Technology in the Management of Diabetes: Which Comes First-Continuous Glucose Monitor or Insulin Pump?

Christopher T Martin, Amy B Criego, Anders L Carlson, Richard M Bergenstal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. User evaluation of the Hypo-METRICS app: A tool for real-time symptom reporting of hypoglycaemia.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Diabetes technology and sexual health: which role?Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Glycemic Status Assessment by the Latest Glucose Monitoring Technologies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher T MartinAllina Health, West Metro Endocrinology, Edina, MN, 55435, USA. christopher.martin@allina.com.
Amy B CriegoInternational Diabetes Center, Park Nicollet Pediatric Endocrine, Minneapolis, MN, 55416, USA.
Anders L CarlsonInternational Diabetes Center, HealthPartners Endocrinology, Minneapolis, MN, 55416, USA.
Richard M BergenstalInternational Diabetes Center, HealthPartners Institutes, Minneapolis, MN, 55416, USA.

Funding

Home Use of MD-Logic Automated Insulin Delivery System: Safety and EfficacyUC4DK108611 · NIDDK · HEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE · PI BERGENSTAL, RICHARD MAURITZ, PHILLIP, MOSHE · 2015 to 2016
$8.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK108611
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIn this article, we consider advanced technologies for the management of diabetes. RECENT

findingsSpecifically, we pose the question of which should come first: an insulin pump (CSII) or a continuous glucose monitor (CGM)? Historical perspective on both insulin delivery and glucose measurement is provided. Recently published clinical trials are reviewed. Practical issues including quality of life, patient education, and out-of-pocket cost are discussed. Based on available evidence and clinical experience, we favor CGM as a first-line technology recommendation for the treatment of type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Indexed as

Blood Glucose Self-MonitoringBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1HumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin Infusion SystemsQuality of LifeBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinContinuous glucose monitorDiabetesHemoglobin A1CHypoglycemiaInsulin pumpTime in range

Identifiers

PMID31250124
PMCPMC6597598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.