Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31250061›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2019

Reductive dechlorination of 1,2-dichloroethane in the presence of chloroethenes and 1,2-dichloropropane as co-contaminants.

Peng Peng, Uwe Schneidewind, Pieter Jan Haest, Tom N P Bosma, Anthony S Danko, Hauke Smidt, Siavash Atashgahi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peng PengLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9982-5210
Uwe SchneidewindDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Pieter Jan HaestAdvanced Groundwater Techniques (AGT), Aartselaar, Belgium.
Tom N P BosmaLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Anthony S DankoCentre for Natural Resources and the Environment (CERENA), Department of Mining Engineering, University of Porto (FEUP), Porto, Portugal.
Hauke SmidtLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Siavash AtashgahiLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands. siavash.atashgahi@wur.nl.

Funding

Ministerie van Economische Zaken (NL) F08.004.01Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap (NL) 024.002.002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1,2-Dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) is one of the most abundant manmade chlorinated organic contaminants in the world. Reductive dechlorination of 1,2-DCA by organohalide-respiring bacteria (OHRB) can be impacted by other chlorinated contaminants such as chloroethenes and chloropropanes that can co-exist with 1,2-DCA at contaminated sites. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of chloroethenes and 1,2-dichloropropane (1,2-DCP) on 1,2-DCA dechlorination using sediment cultures enriched with 1,2-DCA as the sole chlorinated compound (EA culture) or with 1,2-DCA and tetrachloroethene (PCE) (EB culture), and to model dechlorination kinetics. Both cultures contained Dehalococcoides as most predominated OHRB, and Dehalogenimonas and Geobacter as other known OHRB. In sediment-free enrichments obtained from the EA and EB cultures, dechlorination of 1,2-DCA was inhibited in the presence of the same concentrations of either PCE, vinyl chloride (VC), or 1,2-DCP; however, concurrent dechlorination of dual chlorinated compounds was achieved. In contrast, 1,2-DCA dechlorination completely ceased in the presence of cis-dichloroethene (cDCE) and only occurred after cDCE was fully dechlorinated. In turn, 1,2-DCA did not affect dechlorination of PCE, cDCE, VC, and 1,2-DCP. In sediment-free enrichments obtained from the EA culture, Dehalogenimonas 16S rRNA gene copy numbers decreased 1-3 orders of magnitude likely due to an inhibitory effect of chloroethenes. Dechlorination with and without competitive inhibition fit Michaelis-Menten kinetics and confirmed the inhibitory effect of chloroethenes and 1,2-DCP on 1,2-DCA dechlorination. This study reinforces that the type of chlorinated substrate drives the selection of specific OHRB, and indicates that removal of chloroethenes and in particular cDCE might be necessary before effective removal of 1,2-DCA at sites contaminated with mixed chlorinated solvents.

Indexed as

Environmental MicrobiologyBacteriaBiotransformationCluster AnalysisDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalEnvironmental PollutantsEthyl ChlorideEthylene DichloridesOxidation-ReductionPhylogenyPortugalPropaneRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNAWetlandsDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalEnvironmental PollutantsEthyl ChlorideEthylene DichloridesPropanepropylene dichlorideRNA, Ribosomal, 16S1,2-DichloroethaneCo-contaminantsDechlorination kineticsDehalococcoidesDehalogenimonas

Identifiers

PMID31250061
PMCPMC6667407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.