ArticleHealth promotion perspectives2019
Readability of online patient-based information on bariatric surgery.
Article in Health promotion perspectives, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Online patient education resources in bariatric surgery: a systematic evaluation of quality, readability, transparency, and representation.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- A critical analysis of online social support websites for Australians seeking bariatric surgery.Australian journal of psychology · 2026Article
- Patient Education in Bariatric Surgery: Can Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots Bridge the Knowledge Gap?Journal of obesity · 2026Article
- Impact of health literacy and general self-efficacy on surgical outcomes 2 years after bariatric surgery.Clinical obesity · 2025Article
- Freedom of Choice in the United States: Patient Autonomy Is Driving Decision-Making in Bariatric Surgery.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Protein Cards: A nutrition education tool for metabolic bariatric surgery.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Online Search Trends Related to Bariatric Surgery and Their Relationship with Utilization in Australia.Obesity surgery · 2024Article
- Large language models and bariatric surgery patient education: a comparative readability analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Bard, and online institutional resources.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Improving health literacy and stakeholder-directed knowledge of One Health through analysis of readability: a cross sectional infodemiology study.Science in One Health · 2024Article
- Improving health literacy of antibiotic use in people with cystic fibrosis (CF)-comparison of the readability of patient information leaflets (PILs) from the EU, USA and UK of 23 CF-related antibiotics used in the treatment of CF respiratory infections.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2023Article
- Article
- Readability of patient education materials for bariatric surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Assessing the Accuracy of Responses by the Language Model ChatGPT to Questions Regarding Bariatric Surgery.Obesity surgery · 2023Article
- Lost in print: difficulty in reading online information pertaining to phenylketonuria.Journal of community genetics · 2023Article
- High tibial osteotomy: A review of the readability and quality of patient information on the internet.Health promotion perspectives · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.