Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31249637›Full record

Trial reportPain research & management2019

Nonclosure of the Peritoneum during Appendectomy May Cause Less Postoperative Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study.

Huseyin Kazim Bektasoglu, Mustafa Hasbahceci, Samet Yigman, Erkan Yardimci, Enver Kunduz, Fatma Umit Malya

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain research & management, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02803463 (Peritoneal Closure Versus Non Closure During Open Appendectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02803463 nacompletednot on this map

Peritoneal Closure Versus Non Closure During Open Appendectomy: a Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBezmialem Vakif UniversityRan2016 to 2016Enrolled112ConditionsAcute AppendicitisArmsopen appendectomy with peritoneal closure, open appendectomy without peritoneal closure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Huseyin Kazim BektasogluDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul 34093, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2184-0514
Mustafa HasbahceciDepartment of General Surgery, Medical Park Fatih Hospital, Istanbul 34080, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5468-5338
Samet YigmanDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul 34093, Turkey.
Erkan YardimciDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul 34093, Turkey.
Enver KunduzDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul 34093, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7686-2809
Fatma Umit MalyaDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul 34093, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6593-6112

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We aim to evaluate the effect of peritoneal closure on postoperative pain and life quality associated with open appendectomy operations. Methods: This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, and double-blinded study. Here, 18-65-year-old patients who underwent open appendectomy for acute appendicitis were included. Demographic data of the patients, operation time, length of hospital stay, pain scores using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) on the first postoperative day, quality of life assessment using the EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaire on postoperative 10th day, deep wound dehiscence, bowel obstruction, and mortality data were recorded. Results: In total, 112 patients were included in the study. The demographic data showed no significant difference between the groups. The median VAS score was lower in the group with open peritoneum, but this difference was not statistically significant (3 vs. 4, Conclusion: Nonclosure of the peritoneum seems to shorten the duration of surgery without increasing complications during open appendectomy. Postoperative pain and life quality measures were not affected by nonclosure of the peritoneum. This trial is registered with NCT02803463.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAppendectomyAppendicitisDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPeritoneumPostoperative PainProspective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31249637
PMCPMC6556235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.