Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31249611›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2019

Implementation of the mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) within the Fijian Healthcare System: a mixed-methods evaluation.

Fiona Charlson, Odille Chang, Ilisapeci Kubuabola, Jaclyn Schess, Catherine Latu, Ernest Hunter, Isimeli Tukana, Sefanaia Qaloewai, Rahul Shidhaye

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Scalable interventions for refugees.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Fiona Charlson1Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2876-5040
Odille Chang2School of Medical Sciences, CMNHS, Fiji National University, Suva, Fiji.
Ilisapeci Kubuabola3Pacific Research Center for the Prevention of Obesity and NCD (CPOND), Fiji National University, Suva, Fiji.
Jaclyn Schess1Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Brisbane, Australia.
Catherine Latu3Pacific Research Center for the Prevention of Obesity and NCD (CPOND), Fiji National University, Suva, Fiji.
Ernest Hunter5James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.
Isimeli TukanaFiji Ministry of Health and Medical Sciences, Suva, Fiji.
Sefanaia Qaloewai2School of Medical Sciences, CMNHS, Fiji National University, Suva, Fiji.
Rahul Shidhaye7Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Fiji National University · FJJames Cook University · AUMinistry Of Health · FJPark Centre for Mental Health · AUPublic Health Foundation of India · INQueensland Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo facilitate decentralisation and scale-up of mental health services, Fiji's Ministry of Health and Medical Services committed to implementing the World Health Organization's mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP). mhGAP training has been prolific; however, it remains unclear, beyond this, how successfully Fiji's national mental health program has been implemented. We aim to evaluate Fiji's mental health program to inform Fiji's national mental health program and to develop an evidence-base for best practice.

methodsThe study design was guided by the National Implementation Research Network and adhered to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. CFIR constructs were selected to reflect the objectives of this study and were adapted where contextually necessary. A mixed-methods design utilised a series of instruments designed to collect data from healthworkers who had undertaken mhGAP training, senior management staff, health facilities and administrative data.

resultsA total of 66 participants were included in this study. Positive findings include that mhGAP was considered valuable and easy to use, and that health workers who deliver mental health services had a reasonable level of knowledge and willingness to change. Identified weaknesses and opportunities for implementation and system strengthening included the need for improved planning and leadership.

conclusionThis evaluation has unpacked the various implementation processes associated with mhGAP and has simultaneously identified targets for change within the broader mental health system. Notably, the creation of an enabling context is crucial. If Fiji acts upon the findings of this evaluation, it has the opportunity to not only develop effective mental health services in Fiji but to be a role model for other countries in how to successfully implement mhGAP.

Indexed as

EvaluationFijiImplementationmhGAP

Identifiers

PMID31249611
PMCPMC6585143
OpenAlexW2949437603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.