ReviewThe Yale journal of biology and medicine2019
An Interdisciplinary Perspective on the Association Between Chronotype and Well-being.
Review in The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronotypes are significantly associated with emotional well-being in a general population cohort in Hungary.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Significant contribution of chronotype to emotional well-being in chronic psychiatric outpatients in Greece.Neuroscience applied · 2024Article
- The moderating and mediating effects of personality on the association between morningness and well-being.PeerJ · 2023Article
- Morningness-eveningness preference and shift in chronotype during COVID-19 as predictors of mood and well-being in university students.Personality and individual differences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuals with a circadian preference for mental and physical activity later in the day ("Evening types") are consistently found to fare worse on most facets of well-being than individuals with a circadian preference for mental and physical activity earlier in the day ("Morning types"). Several explanatory hypotheses of this association between chronotype and well-being have been proposed, including shared genetic, biological, developmental, and psychosocial mechanisms. This paper presents a critical summary of these explanatory mechanisms and offers suggestions for their integration in an interdisciplinary biopsychosocial framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31249496PMC6585516What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.