ReviewThe Yale journal of biology and medicine2019
Circadian Responses to Fragmented Light: Research Synopsis in Humans.
Review in The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- A millisecond parameter space for phase-shifting the circadian pacemaker with near-ultraviolet light.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2025Article
- The effects of music and darkness on radionuclide distribution during mice FDG-PET scan.Iranian journal of veterinary research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Light is the chief signal used by the human circadian pacemaker to maintain precise biological timekeeping. Though it has been historically assumed that light resets the pacemaker's rhythm in a dose-dependent fashion, a number of studies report enhanced circadian photosensitivity to the initial moments of light exposure, such that there are quickly diminishing returns on phase-shifting the longer the light is shown. In the current review, we summarize findings from a family of experiments conducted over two decades in the research wing of the Brigham and Women's Hospital that examined the human pacemaker's responses to standardized changes in light patterns generated from an overhead fluorescent ballast. Across several hundred days of laboratory recording, the research group observed phase-shifts in the body temperature and melatonin rhythms that scaled with illuminance. However, as suspected, phase resetting was optimized when exposure occurred as a series of minute-long episodes separated by periods of intervening darkness. These observations set the stage for a more recent program of study at Stanford University that evaluated whether the human pacemaker was capable of integrating fragmented bursts of light in much the same way it perceived steady luminance. The results here suggest that ultra-short durations of light-lasting just 1-2 seconds in total-can elicit pacemaker responses rivaling those created by continuous hour-long stimulation if those few seconds of light are evenly distributed across the hour as discreet 2-millisecond pulses. We conclude our review with a brief discussion of these findings and their potential application in future phototherapy techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31249494PMC6585514W2998507913What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.