Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31249456›Full record

ReviewActa Cardiologica Sinica2019

2019 Consensus of the Taiwan Hypertension Society and Taiwan Society of Cardiology on the Clinical Application of Central Blood Pressure in the Management of Hypertension.

Hao-Min Cheng, Shao-Yuan Chuang, Shih-Hsien Sung, Chih-Cheng Wu, Jiun-Jr Wang, Pai-Feng Hsu, Chia-Lun Chao, Juey-Jen Hwang, Tzung-Dau Wang, Chen-Huan Chen

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Vascular Aging and Central Aortic Blood Pressure: From Pathophysiology to Treatment.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hao-Min ChengFaculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine.
Shao-Yuan ChuangInstitute of Population Health Science, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli.
Shih-Hsien SungFaculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine.
Chih-Cheng WuCardiovascular Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsinchu Branch.
Jiun-Jr WangSchool of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, Xinzhuang District, New Taipei City.
Pai-Feng HsuFaculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine.
Chia-Lun ChaoCardinal Tien Hospital An Kang District, New Taipei City.
Juey-Jen HwangDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei.
Tzung-Dau WangCardiovascular Center and Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chen-Huan ChenFaculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWNational Health Research Institutes · TWNational Taiwan University · TWNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Taiwan Society of Cardiology (TSOC) and the Taiwan Hypertension Society (THS) have appointed a joint consensus group for the 2019 Consensus of the TSOC and THS on the Clinical Application of Central blood pressure (BP) in the Management of Hypertension with the aim of formulating a management consensus on the clinical application of central BP in the management of hypertension. This consensus document focuses on the clinical application of central BP in the care of patients with hypertension. The major determinants of central BP are increased arterial stiffness and wave reflection, which are also the dominant hemodynamic manifestations of vascular aging. Central BP can be measured noninvasively using various techniques, including with convenient cuff-based oscillometric central BP monitors. Noninvasive central BP is better than conventional brachial BP to assess target organ damage and long-term cardiovascular outcomes. Based on the analysis of long-term events, a central BP threshold of 130/90 mmHg for defining hypertension has been proposed. Recent studies have suggested that a central BP strategy to confirm a diagnosis of hypertension may be more cost-effective than conventional strategies, and that guiding hypertension management with central BP may result in the use of fewer medications to achieve BP control. Although noninvasive measurements of brachial BP are inaccurate and central BP has been shown to carry superior prognostic value beyond brachial BP, the use of central BP should be justified in studies comparing central BP-guided therapeutic strategies with conventional care for cardiovascular events.

Indexed as

Brachial BPCentral BPDiagnosisHigh BPHypertensionManagementPeripheral BP

Identifiers

PMID31249456
PMCPMC6533580
OpenAlexW2997278164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.