Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31249443›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2019

Modified FOLFIRINOX for resected pancreatic cancer: Opportunities and challenges.

Feng Yang, Chen Jin, De-Liang Fu, Andrew L Warshaw

Open access · hybridAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Feng YangDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China. yffudan98@126.com.
Chen JinDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
De-Liang FuDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Andrew L WarshawDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Huashan Hospital · CNHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide. Adjuvant chemotherapy has been developed based on the experiences made with palliative chemotherapy, and advocated to improve long-term survival of patients with this disease. However, the optimal chemotherapeutic regimen remains controversial. Recently, Conroy et al demonstrated the impressive benefits of modified FOLFIRINOX over gemcitabine alone in the multicenter Partenariat de Recherche en Oncologie Digestive 24 (PRODIGE-24) trial. The remarkable results mark a new milestone in treating resectable pancreatic cancer and have now changed the standard of care for this patient population. In this commentary, we discuss an issue of difference of tumor grade between the PRODIGE-24 trial and previous phase III trials. We also discuss potential biomarkers predicting therapeutic response to modified FOLFIRINOX. Finally, we summarize several ongoing clinical trials of replacing part of the FOLFIRINOX regimen with Xeloda/S-1/nanoliposomal irinotecan for pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsPancreatic NeoplasmsDeoxycytidineFluorouracilGemcitabineGermanyHumansIrinotecanLeucovorinDeoxycytidineFluorouracilGemcitabineIrinotecanLeucovorinAdjuvant therapyFOLFIRINOXNanoliposomal irinotecanNeutrophil-to-lymphocytePancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID31249443
PMCPMC6589737
OpenAlexW2950207241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.