ArticleNature reviews. Clinical oncology2019
Google's lung cancer AI: a promising tool that needs further validation.
Article in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiomics machine learning models for lung cancer early diagnosis in heterogenous multicentre chest CT data: LIBRA study results.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- CellTypeAI: cell annotation for scRNA-seq using local generative-AI.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Decoding the enigma of multiple primary lung cancers: from mechanism to bedside-a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in lung cancer: current applications, future perspectives, and challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Review
- Squeeze-MNet: Precise Skin Cancer Detection Model for Low Computing IoT Devices Using Transfer Learning.Cancers · 2022Article
- Registered Clinical Trials for Artificial Intelligence in Lung Disease: A Scoping Review on ClinicalTrials.gov.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted decision making for prognosis and drug efficacy prediction in lung cancer patients: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Review
- Deep Learning for Lung Cancer Detection on Screening CT Scans: Results of a Large-Scale Public Competition and an Observer Study with 11 Radiologists.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2021Article
- [Research Progress in Distinguishing Methods of Simultaneous Multiple Primary Lung Cancer and Intrapulmonary Metastasis].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2021Review
- Artificial intelligence for detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules in lung cancer CT screening: ready for practice?Translational lung cancer research · 2021Review
- Artificial Intelligence and its future potential in lung cancer screening.EXCLI journal · 2020Review
- Clinical Trials for Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis: A Cross-Sectional Study of Registered Trials in ClinicalTrials.gov.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31249401What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.