Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31249294›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

MorphoNet: an interactive online morphological browser to explore complex multi-scale data.

Bruno Leggio, Julien Laussu, Axel Carlier, Christophe Godin, Patrick Lemaire, Emmanuel Faure

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Methods for the Study of Apical Constriction During Ascidian Gastrulation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bruno LeggioCentre de Recherche de Biologie cellulaire de Montpellier (CRBM), Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, 34293, France.
Julien LaussuCentre de Recherche de Biologie cellulaire de Montpellier (CRBM), Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, 34293, France.
Axel CarlierInformatics Research Institute of Toulouse (IRIT), CNRS, INPT, ENSEEIHT, University of Toulouse I and III, Toulouse, 31062, France.
Christophe GodinLaboratoire Reproduction et Développement des Plantes (LRDP), Univ Lyon, ENS de Lyon, UCB Lyon 1, CNRS, INRA, Inria, Lyon, 69342, France.
Patrick LemaireCentre de Recherche de Biologie cellulaire de Montpellier (CRBM), Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, 34293, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4925-2009
Emmanuel FaureCentre de Recherche de Biologie cellulaire de Montpellier (CRBM), Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, 34293, France. emmanuel.faure@lirmm.fr.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-11-BINF-0002Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-14-CE11-0013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Powerful novel imaging and image-processing methods are revolutionizing many fields of biology, at scales ranging from the molecule to the functional organ. To support this big-data revolution, we develop a concept of generic web-based morphodynamic browser to interactively visualize complex image datasets, with applications in research and education. MorphoNet handles a broad range of natural or simulated morphological data, onto which quantitative geometric or genetic data can be projected.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticInternetWeb BrowserSoftware

Identifiers

PMID31249294
PMCPMC6597584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.