ArticleThe oncologist2019
Article in The oncologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Manganese-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: From Translational Research to First-in-Human Trials in Oncology.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Review
- d-serine as a metabolic immune checkpoint in the tumour microenvironment.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- FGFR2 amplification and fusion identified by NGS align with FGFR2b overexpression.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Review
- Molecular characteristics of proximal and distal esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- WJOG18524G: a single-arm phase II study evaluating bemarituzumab combined with ramucirumab and paclitaxel in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2b (FGFR2b)-positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (RAINBIRD).ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Multi-omic characterization of early-onset esophagogastric cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Prognostic markers in oesophageal and gastric cancer review. Are they ready for clinical practice?ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Review
- Diffuse Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Molecular Features and Emerging Therapeutics.Targeted oncology · 2024Review
- Article
- Current and Future Biomarkers in Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2024Review
- Review
- Clinical Implication of Concurrent Amplification of MET and FGFR2 in Metastatic Gastric Cancer.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- FGFR2-amplified tumor clones are markedly heterogeneously distributed in carcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Detection of a NovelGenes · 2023Article
- Targeting FGFR Pathway Is Not an Effective Therapeutic Strategy in Patients with Unselected Metastatic Esophagogastric Cancer Resistant to Trastuzumab.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Response prediction in patients with gastric and esophagogastric adenocarcinoma under neoadjuvant chemotherapy using targeted gene expression analysis and next-generation sequencing in pre-therapeutic biopsies.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Review
- Targeting FGFR2 Positive Gastroesophageal Cancer: Current and Clinical Developments.OncoTargets and therapy · 2022Review
- FGFR2 overexpression and compromised survival in diffuse-type gastric cancer in a large central European cohort.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWith the exception of trastuzumab, therapies directed at receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) in gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas (GEA) have had limited success. Recurrent fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) alterations exist in GEA; however, little is known about the genomic landscape of SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND
methodsA total of 6,667 tissue specimens from patients with advanced GEA were assayed using hybrid capture-based genomic profiling. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was determined on up to 1.1 Mb of sequenced DNA, and microsatellite instability was determined on 95 or 114 loci. Descriptive statistics were used to compare subgroups.
resultsWe identified a total of 269 (4.0%)
conclusionIMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Actionable receptor tyrosine kinase alterations assayed within a genomic context with therapeutic implications remain limited to
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.