ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2019
Adding a Question About Method Switching to the Method Information Index Is a Better Predictor of Contraceptive Continuation.
Article in Global health, science and practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- 'For my own safety and peace of mind': views on contraception among young emergency contraception users: a qualitative study in Swedish pharmacies.Reproduction & fertility · 2026Article
- Challenges to informed choice counselling: a qualitative study of contraceptive self-care introduction in the Copperbelt Province of Zambia.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Piloting measures of provider-imposed contraceptive coercion among reproductive-aged contraceptive users in Kisumu, Kenya: a cross-sectional, population-based study.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2025Article
- Measuring Informed Choice for Contraception in Burkina Faso: Comparing self-rated and researcher-ascribed measures.Social indicators research · 2025Article
- Person-Centered Measurement: Ensuring Prioritization of Individuals' Values, Needs, and Preferences Within the Global Contraceptive Measurement Ecosystem.Studies in family planning · 2025Article
- DMPA-SC self-injection experiences of clients and providers in Uganda: the role of community health workers in reproductive self-care service delivery.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Keeping the "R" in LARC (long-acting reversible contraception): Measuring client-centered implant removal services in sub-Saharan Africa.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Missed opportunities of method information index plus (MII+) counseling among current modern contraceptive users. multi-level analysis from the Ethiopian PMA 2021 data set.BMC public health · 2024Article
- PrEP Method Switching: Will it Yield Greater Coverage of HIV Protection? Applying Lessons Learned from Family Planning to Guide Future Research in the Context of PrEP Choice.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2024Review
- Quality adjusted coverage of family planning services in low- and middle-income countries: Analysis of 33 countries using Demographic and Health Survey data.Journal of global health · 2024Article
- Evaluating Counseling for Choice in Malawi: A Client-Centered Approach to Contraceptive Counseling.Global health, science and practice · 2023Article
- Validation and Predictive Utility of a Person-Centered Quality of Contraceptive Counseling (QCC-10) Scale in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Multicountry Study of Family Planning Clients and a New Indicator for Measuring High-Quality, Rights-Based Care.Studies in family planning · 2023Article
- Improving provider and client communication around family planning in Togo: Results from a cross-sectional survey.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- The use of Method Information Index (MII) to monitor the amount of information given to women users of modern contraceptives in Indonesia: results from an analysis of the 2007, 2012 and 2017 demographic and health surveys.BMC women's health · 2022Article
- Contributions of side effects to contraceptive discontinuation and method switch among Kenyan women: a prospective cohort study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2022Article
- What Distinguishes Women Who Choose to Self-Inject? A Prospective Cohort Study of Subcutaneous Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate Users in Ghana.Global health, science and practice · 2022Article
- Changes in clients' perceptions of family planning quality of care in Kaduna and Lagos States, Nigeria: A mixed methods study.Frontiers in global women's health · 2022Article
- Article
- Women's contraceptive profiles in Burundi: Knowledge, attitudes, and interactions with media and health services.PloS one · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Method Information Index (MII) is 1 of 18 core indicators used to monitor progress toward achieving Family Planning 2020's goal of 120 million more women using a modern method of family planning by 2020. The 3 questions of the MII are intended to measure informed choice at method initiation. Although routinely used in the Demographic and Health Surveys and the Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 project in cross-sectional household surveys, the MII may not adequately reflect all key aspects of quality of care or predict contraceptive continuation. In the current study, a question was added to the MII regarding the possibility of switching to a different contraceptive method if the current method is not suitable. The revised MII is referred to as MIIplus.
methodsA total of 2,699 married women aged 15-49 who started a new episode of use of intrauterine device, injectable, or oral contraceptive pills between December 2016 and October 2017 were followed for 1 year in India and interviewed at method start and 3, 6, and 12 months later. Of these women, 2,267 were interviewed 3 months later and included in the analysis. Using 3 Cox proportional hazard models, we estimated hazard ratios for risk of discontinuation, based on the MII, MIIplus, and a recategorization of MIIplus into a 3-category variable.
resultsThe modern method continuation rate 100 days (∼3 months) later was 91% overall. Women who received the information in MIIplus were more likely to continue using a method at 100 days (95%) compared to those who received information covered in the MII (82%) or less than 3 components of the MII (89%) (
conclusionWe recommend including the question about the possibility of switching to another family planning method in routine measurement because it better predicts contraceptive continuation than the MII alone and ensures that another domain of quality of care is reflected in the measurement. When programs provide information on the possibility of switching, women are better informed about voluntary family planning choice and their options to continue family planning when a method is not suitable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.