Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31249019›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2019

"It's Not Like Taking Chocolates": Factors Influencing the Feasibility and Sustainability of Universal Test and Treat in Correctional Health Systems in Zambia and South Africa.

Stephanie M Topp, Candice M Chetty-Makkan, Helene J Smith, Lucy Chimoyi, Christopher J Hoffmann, Katherine Fielding, Stewart E Reid, Abraham J Olivier, Harry Hausler, Michael E Herce and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Stephanie M ToppCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia. globalstopp@gmail.com.
Candice M Chetty-MakkanThe Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Helene J SmithCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.
Lucy ChimoyiThe Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Christopher J HoffmannJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Katherine FieldingLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Stewart E ReidCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.
Abraham J OlivierTB/HIV Care Association, Cape Town, South Africa.
Harry HauslerTB/HIV Care Association, Cape Town, South Africa.
Michael E HerceCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.
Salome CharalambousThe Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSub-Saharan African correctional facilities concentrate large numbers of people who are living with HIV or at risk for HIV infection. Universal test and treat (UTT) is widely recognized as a promising approach to improve the health of individuals and a population health strategy to reduce new HIV infections. In this study, we explored the feasibility and sustainability of implementing UTT in correctional facilities in Zambia and South Africa.

methodsNested within a UTT implementation research study, our qualitative evaluation of feasibility and sustainability used a case-comparison design based on data from 1 Zambian and 3 South African correctional facilities. Primary data from in-depth interviews with incarcerated individuals, correctional managers, health care providers, and policy makers were supplemented by public policy documents, study documentation, and implementation memos in both countries. Thematic analysis was informed by an empirically established conceptual framework for health system analysis.

resultsDespite different institutional profiles, we were able to successfully introduce UTT in the South Africa and Zambian correctional facilities participating in the study. A supportive policy backdrop was important to UTT implementation and establishment in both countries. However, sustainability of UTT, defined as relevant government departments' capacity to independently plan, resource, and administer quality UTT, differed. South Africa's correctional facilities had existing systems to deliver and monitor chronic HIV care and treatment, forming a "scaffolding" for sustained UTT despite some human resources shortages and poorly integrated health information systems. Notwithstanding recent improvements, Zambia's correctional health system demonstrated insufficient material and technical capacity to independently deliver quality UTT. In the correctional facilities of both countries, inmate population dynamics and their impact on HIV-related stigma were important factors in UTT service uptake.

conclusionFindings demonstrate the critical role of policy directives, health service delivery systems, adequate resourcing, and population dynamics on the feasibility and likely sustainability of UTT in corrections in Zambia and South Africa.

Indexed as

Health ServicesHealth Services AccessibilityMass ScreeningPrisonsProgram EvaluationAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleGovernment ProgramsHealth PolicyHIV InfectionsHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchSocial Stigma

Identifiers

PMID31249019
PMCPMC6641809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.