Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31248929›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Diarrhoea: interventions, consequences and epidemiology in the intensive care unit (DICE-ICU): a protocol for a prospective multicentre cohort study.

Joanna C Dionne, Kristen Sullivan, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Alyson Takaoka, Erick Huaileigh Duan, Waleed Alhazzani, John W Devlin, Matthew Duprey, Paul Moayyedi, David Armstrong and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gastrointestinal Tolerance toIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Faecal diversion system usage in an adult intensive care unit.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2020
    Observational
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Joanna C DionneDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9401-6868
Kristen SullivanDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Lawrence MbuagbawDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5855-5461
Alyson TakaokaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Erick Huaileigh DuanDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Waleed AlhazzaniDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
John W DevlinSchool of Pharamcy, Northeastern University, Bouve College of Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Matthew DupreySchool of Pharamcy, Northeastern University, Bouve College of Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Paul MoayyediDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
David ArmstrongDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Lehana ThabaneDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer L Y TsangDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1809-0505
Roman JaeschkeDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Cindy HamielecDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Tim KarachiDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Rodrigo Cartin-CebaDepartment of Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
John MuscedereDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Mohammed Saeed Saad AlshahraniDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5946-2128
Deborah J CookDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Impact · CAMcMaster University · CANiagara Health System · CANortheastern University · USPopulation Health Research Institute · CAKing Fahd Hospital of the University · SAQueen's University · CAWinnMed · US

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDiarrhoea is a frequent concern in the intensive care unit (ICU) and is associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation, increased length of ICU stay, skin breakdown and renal dysfunction. However, its prevalence, aetiology and prognosis in the critically ill have been poorly studied. The primary objectives of this study are to determine the incidence, risk factors and consequences of diarrhoea in critically ill adults. The secondary objectives are to estimate the incidence of METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This international prospective cohort study will enrol patients over 10 weeks in 12 ICUs in Canada, the USA, Poland and Saudi Arabia. We will include all patients 18 years of age and older who are admitted to the ICU for at least 24 hours and follow them daily until ICU discharge. Our primary outcome is the incidence of diarrhoea based on the WHO definition, during the ICU stay. Our secondary outcomes include: CDAD, ICU and hospital mortality and ICU and hospital length of stay. We will use logistic regression to identify factors associated with diarrhoea (as defined using WHO criteria) and the kappa statistic to measure agreement on diarrhoea rates between the WHO definition and the Bristol Stool Chart and Bliss Stool Classification System. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the research ethics board of all participating centres. The diarrhoea interventions, consequences and epidemiology in the intensive care unit (DICE-ICU) study will generate evidence about diarrhoea and its frequency, predisposing factors and consequences, to inform critical care practice and future research. LAY SUMMARY: Diarrhoea is a frequent clinical problem for hospitalised patients including those who are critically ill in the ICU. Diarrhoea can cause complications such as skin damage, dehydration and kidney problems. It is not clear how common diarrhoea is in the ICU, the factors that cause it or the best way for clinicians to assess it. The DICE-ICU study is an international prospective observational study to examine the frequency, risk factors and outcomes of diarrhoea during critical illness.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessIntensive Care UnitsCanadaDiarrheaHospital MortalityHumansIncidenceLength of StayMulticenter Studies as TopicPolandProspective StudiesResearch DesignRisk FactorsSaudi ArabiaUnited Statesclostridium difficilediarrheaobservational cohort

Identifiers

PMID31248929
PMCPMC6597652
OpenAlexW2953767523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.