Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31248453›Full record

ArticleStem cell research & therapy2019

Bone marrow vs Wharton's jelly mesenchymal stem cells in experimental sepsis: a comparative study.

Caroline Laroye, Amir Boufenzer, Lucie Jolly, Lisiane Cunat, Corentine Alauzet, Jean-Louis Merlin, Clémence Yguel, Danièle Bensoussan, Loïc Reppel, Sébastien Gibot

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline LaroyeCHRU de Nancy, Unité de Thérapie Cellulaire et banque de Tissus, Allée du Morvan, 54500, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France. c.laroye@chru-nancy.fr.
Amir BoufenzerINOTREM, 54500, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Lucie JollyINSERM UMRS-1116, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Lisiane CunatUniversité de Lorraine, 54000, Nancy, France.
Corentine AlauzetUniversité de Lorraine, 54000, Nancy, France.
Jean-Louis MerlinUniversité de Lorraine, 54000, Nancy, France.
Clémence YguelCHRU de Nancy, laboratoire anatomie et cytologie pathologiques, 54500, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Danièle BensoussanCHRU de Nancy, Unité de Thérapie Cellulaire et banque de Tissus, Allée du Morvan, 54500, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Loïc ReppelCHRU de Nancy, Unité de Thérapie Cellulaire et banque de Tissus, Allée du Morvan, 54500, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Sébastien GibotINSERM UMRS-1116, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Banque Populaire · FRDélégation Centre-Est · FRInserm · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut de Cancérologie de Lorraine · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is being extensively studied in clinical trials in the setting of various diseases including diabetes, stroke, and progressive multiple sclerosis. The unique immunomodulatory properties of MSCs also point them as a possible therapeutic tool during sepsis and septic shock, a devastating syndrome associated with 30-35% mortality. However, MSCs are not equal regarding their activity, depending on their tissue origin. Here, we aimed at comparing the in vivo properties of MSCs according to their tissue source (bone marrow (BM) versus Wharton's jelly (WJ)) in a murine cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) model of sepsis that mimics a human peritonitis. We hypothesized that MSC properties may vary depending on their tissue source in the setting of sepsis.

methodsCLP, adult, male, C57BL/6 mice were randomized in 3 groups receiving respectively 0.25 × 10

resultsWe observed that both types of MSCs regulated leukocyte trafficking and reduced organ dysfunction, while only WJ-MSCs were able to improve bacterial clearance and survival.

conclusionThis study highlights the importance to determine the most appropriate source of MSCs for a given therapeutic indication and suggests a better profile for WJ-MSCs during sepsis.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone Marrow CellsCecumCells, CulturedHumansInflammationLeukocytesLigationMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPeritonitisPuncturesSepsisBone marrowMesenchymal stem cellsSepsisTissue sourceWharton’s jelly

Identifiers

PMID31248453
PMCPMC6598309
OpenAlexW2954161703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.