Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31248425›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2019

Before and after implementation of group antenatal care in Rwanda: a qualitative study of women's experiences.

Angele Musabyimana, Tiffany Lundeen, Elizabeth Butrick, Felix Sayinzoga, Bernard Ngabo Rwabufigiri, Dilys Walker, Sabine F Musange

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03154177 (Group Antenatal/Postnatal Care in Rwanda), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03154177 nacompletednot on this map

Group Antenatal/Postnatal Care in Rwanda: a Cluster Randomized Control Trial (RCT) to Measure Its Effectiveness on Increasing Gestational Age, Mortality Among Preterm and Low Birth Weight Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2017 to 2019Enrolled26,381ConditionsPregnancy Complications, Preterm Birth, Preterm Labor, StillbirthArmsGroup ANC/PNC, Ultrasound+Pregnancy Testing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Angele MusabyimanaSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, P.O Box 3286, Kigali, Rwanda.
Tiffany LundeenInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 3rd floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA. tiffany.lundeen@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7039-6253
Elizabeth ButrickInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 3rd floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Felix SayinzogaMaternal, Child and Community Health Division, Rwanda Biomedical Center, Kigali, Rwanda.
Bernard Ngabo RwabufigiriSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, P.O Box 3286, Kigali, Rwanda.
Dilys WalkerInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 3rd floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Sabine F MusangeSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, P.O Box 3286, Kigali, Rwanda.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1107312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Preterm Birth Initiative-Rwanda is conducting a 36-cluster randomized controlled trial of group antenatal and postnatal care. In the context of this trial, we collected qualitative data before and after implementation. The purpose was two-fold. First, to inform the design of the group care program before implementation and second, to document women's experiences of group care at the mid-point of the trial to make ongoing programmatic adjustments and improvements.

methodsWe completed 8 focus group discussions among women of reproductive age before group care implementation and 6 focus group discussions among women who participated in group antenatal care and/or postnatal care at 18 health centers that introduced the model, approximately 9 months after implementation.

resultsBefore implementation, focus group participants reported both enthusiasm for the potential for support and insight from a group of peers and concern about the risk of sharing private information with peers who may judge, mock, or gossip. After implementation, group care participants reported benefits including increased knowledge, peer support, and more satisfying relationships with providers. When asked about barriers to group care participation, none of them cited concern about privacy but instead cited lack of financial resources, lack of cooperation from a male partner, and long distances to the health center. Finally, women stated that the group care experience would be improved if all participants and providers arrived on time and remained focused on the group care visit throughout. DISCUSSION: These results are consistent with other published reports of women's perceptions of group antenatal care, especially increased pregnancy- and parenting-related knowledge, peer support, and improved relationships with health care providers. Some results were unexpected, especially the consequences of staff allocation patterns that resulted in providers arriving late for group visits or having to leave during group visits to attend to other facility services, which diminished women's experiences of care.

conclusionGroup antenatal and postnatal care provide compelling benefits to women and families. If the model requires the addition of human resources at the health center, intensive reminder communications, and large-scale community outreach to benefit the largest number of pregnant and postnatal mothers, those additional resources required must be factored into any future decision to scale a group care model.

trial registrationThis trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03154177 .

Indexed as

Focus GroupsAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHealth Plan ImplementationHealth PlanningHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPrenatal CareQualitative ResearchRwandaWomenYoung AdultAntenatal careClients’ perspectivesGroup carePostnatal carePregnancyPrenatal careQualitative studyRwandaSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID31248425
PMCPMC6595554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.