Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31248420›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

The migration-related language barrier and professional interpreter use in primary health care in Switzerland.

Fabienne N Jaeger, Nicole Pellaud, Bénédicte Laville, Pierre Klauser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Culturally and linguistically diverse patients in an Italian memory clinic: lessons learned from the ImmiDem project.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Observational
  9. Upholding the right to health of forcibly displaced children in Europe.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fabienne N JaegerKollegium für Hausarztmedizin, Bern, Switzerland. fabienne.jaeger@swisstph.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8441-3907
Nicole PellaudSwiss Society of Paediatrics, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Bénédicte LavilleKollegium für Hausarztmedizin, Bern, Switzerland.
Pierre KlauserKollegium für Hausarztmedizin, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith increased international migration, language barriers are likely becoming more relevant in primary care. The aim of this study was to investigate the language barrier in paediatric and adult primary care, present its consequences, reveal how it is overcome, as well as highlight the use of and potential unmet needs for professional interpreters, using Switzerland as a case study.

methodsPrimary healthcare providers were invited nation-wide to participate in an online questionnaire on language barriers faced and interpreter use.

resultsMore than 90% of the 599 participants in this nation-wide cross-sectional study face relevant language barriers at least once a year, 30.0% even once a week. Using family members and friends for translations is reported as the most frequent resort for overcoming the language barrier (60.1% report it for more than 50% of encounters), followed by "using gestures" (32.0%) or just accepting the insufficient communication (22.9%). Minors interpret frequently (frequent use: 23.3%). Two thirds of physicians facing language barriers never have access to a professional interpreter, the majority (87.8%) though would appreciate their presence and approximately one quarter of these even see a cost-saving potential. Multiple consequences affecting quality of care in the absence of professional interpreters are identified.

conclusionLanguage barriers are relevant in primary care. Improved access to professional interpreters is warranted.

Indexed as

CommunicationCommunication BarriersPrimary Health CareTransients and MigrantsTranslatingAdultAllied Health PersonnelChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleReferral and ConsultationSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandFamily doctorGeneral practitionerInterpreterLanguage barrierMigrantPaediatricPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID31248420
PMCPMC6598246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.