ArticleMicromachines2019
Microfluidic Cell Trapping for Single-Cell Analysis.
Article in Micromachines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- [Progress and prospect of separation and analysis of single-cell and single-particle exosomes].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2025Review
- Lab-on-a-chip device for microfluidic trapping and TIRF imaging of single cells.Biomedical microdevices · 2025Article
- A novel microfluidic chip integrated with Pt micro-thermometer for temperature measurement at the single-cell level.Heliyon · 2024Article
- On-chip Raman spectroscopy of live single cells for the staging of oesophageal adenocarcinoma progression.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Advances in Microfluidics for Single Red Blood Cell Analysis.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Magnetically-actuated microcages for cells entrapment, fabricated by laser direct writing via two photon polymerization.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- A Resistance-Based Microfluidic Chip for Deterministic Single Cell Trapping Followed by Immunofluorescence Staining.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Experiments on Liquid Flow through Non-Circular Micro-Orifices.Micromachines · 2020Article
- Investigation of Leukocyte Viability and Damage in Spiral Microchannel and Contraction-Expansion Array.Micromachines · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The single-cell capture microfluidic chip has many advantages, including low cost, high throughput, easy manufacturing, integration, non-toxicity and good stability. Because of these characteristics, the cell capture microfluidic chip is increasingly becoming an important carrier on the study of life science and pharmaceutical analysis. Important promises of single-cell analysis are the paring, fusion, disruption and analysis of intracellular components for capturing a single cell. The capture, which is based on the fluid dynamics method in the field of micro fluidic chips is an important way to achieve and realize the operations mentioned above. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of three fluid dynamics-based microfluidic chip structures to capture cells. The effects of cell growth and distribution after being captured by different structural chips and the subsequent observation and analysis of single cells on the chip were compared. It can be seen from the experimental results that the microfluidic chip structure most suitable for single-cell capture is a U-shaped structure. It enables single-cell capture as well as long-term continuous culture and the single-cell observation of captured cells. Compared to the U-shaped structure, the cells captured by the microcavity structure easily overlapped during the culture process and affected the subsequent analysis of single cells. The flow shortcut structure can also be used to capture and observe single cells, however, the shearing force of the fluid caused by the chip structure is likely to cause deformation of the cultured cells. By comparing the cell capture efficiency of the three chips, the reagent loss during the culture process and the cell growth state of the captured cells, we are provided with a theoretical support for the design of a single-cell capture microfluidic chip and a reference for the study of single-cell capture in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.