Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31248006›Full record

Observational studyNutrients2019

Growth, Feeding Tolerance and Metabolism in Extreme Preterm Infants under an Exclusive Human Milk Diet.

Fabian Eibensteiner, Lorenz Auer-Hackenberg, Bernd Jilma, Margarita Thanhaeuser, Martin Wald, Nadja Haiden

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Exclusive human milk diet is associated with lower risk of motor function impairment at three years of corrected age.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Fortification With Bovine Colostrum Enhances Antibacterial Activity of Human Milk.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2021
    Article
  9. [Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of feeding intolerance in preterm infants (2020)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fabian EibensteinerDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Pediatric Intensive Care and Neuropediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria. fabian.eibensteiner@meduniwien.ac.at.
Lorenz Auer-HackenbergDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria. l.auer-hackenberg@salk.at.
Bernd JilmaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria. l.auer-hackenberg@salk.at.
Margarita ThanhaeuserDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Pediatric Intensive Care and Neuropediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria. margarita.thanhaeuser@meduniwien.ac.at.
Martin WaldDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Nadja HaidenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria. nadja.haiden@meduniwien.ac.at.
Medical University of Vienna · ATParacelsus Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor preterm infants, human milk (HM) has to be fortified to cover their enhanced nutritional requirements and establish adequate growth. Most HM fortifiers are based on bovine protein sources (BMF). An HM fortifier based on human protein sources (HMF) has become available in the last few years. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of an HMF versus BMF on growth in extremely low birth weight (ELBW, <1000 g) infants.

methodsThis was a retrospective, controlled, multicenter cohort study in infants with a birthweight below 1000 g. The HMF group received an exclusive HM diet up to 32+0 weeks of gestation and was changed to BMF afterwards. The BMF group received HM+BMF from fortifier introduction up to 37+0 weeks.

results192 extremely low birth weight (ELBW)-infants were included (HMF

conclusionResults from this study do not support the superiority of HFM over BMF in ELBW infants.

Indexed as

Bottle FeedingChild DevelopmentInfant FormulaInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMilk, HumanNutritional StatusAge FactorsAustriaBirth WeightEnterocolitis, NecrotizingGestational AgeHumansInfant, Extremely Low Birth WeightInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornNutritive ValueELBW-infantsexclusive human milk dietfeeding tolerancefortification of human milkgrowth velocity

Identifiers

PMID31248006
PMCPMC6683272
OpenAlexW2953533762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.