Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31247904›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Heavy Metals in California Women Living in a Gold Mining-Impacted Community.

Julie Von Behren, Ruiling Liu, Jane Sellen, Christine N Duffy, Ryszard Gajek, Key-Young Choe, Josephine DeGuzman, M Katy Janes, Joanne Hild, Peggy Reynolds

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Occupational Safety and Health of Women in Mining.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julie Von BehrenCancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA 94538, USA. Julie.Vonbehren@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9342-5299
Ruiling LiuCancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA 94538, USA.
Jane SellenSierra Streams Institute, Nevada City, CA 95959, USA.
Christine N DuffyCancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA 94538, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5627-3401
Ryszard GajekEnvironmental Health Laboratory, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA 94804, USA.
Key-Young ChoeEnvironmental Health Laboratory, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA 94804, USA.
Josephine DeGuzmanEnvironmental Health Laboratory, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA 94804, USA.
M Katy JanesSierra Streams Institute, Nevada City, CA 95959, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2666-7781
Joanne HildSierra Streams Institute, Nevada City, CA 95959, USA.
Peggy ReynoldsCancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA 94538, USA.
Cancer Prevention Institute of California · USCalifornia Department of Public Health · USSierra Streams Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gold mining activities occurred throughout the foothills of the Sierra Nevada Mountains in California, leaving behind persistent toxic contaminants in the soil, dust, and water that include arsenic and cadmium. Despite a high level of concern among local residents about potential exposure and high breast cancer rates, no biomonitoring data has been collected to evaluate the levels of heavy metals. We conducted a study to characterize the urinary levels of heavy metals among women in this region by working with the community in Nevada County. Sixty women provided urine samples and completed a questionnaire. We examined levels of arsenic, cadmium, and other metals in relation to the length of residency in the area, age, dietary factors, recreational activities, and smoking. We compared urinary metal levels in participants to levels in the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Overall, study participants had higher urinary levels of arsenic than women in the national sample. Cadmium levels were similar to the national average, although they were elevated in women ≥35 years who had lived in the region for 10 years or more. Arsenic levels were higher among women who smoked, ate fish, ate home-grown produce, and who reported frequent hiking or trail running, although these differences were not statistically significant. This study established a successful community-research partnership, which facilitated community dialogue about possible human health consequences of living in a mining-impacted area.

Indexed as

GoldAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsArsenicCadmiumCaliforniaDietEnvironmental MonitoringFemaleHealth SurveysHumansLeisure ActivitiesMetals, HeavyMiddle AgedArsenicCadmiumGoldMetals, HeavyarseniccadmiumCaliforniagold miningheavy metals

Identifiers

PMID31247904
PMCPMC6651337
OpenAlexW2955460692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.