Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31247699›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry investigation2019

Diagnostic Neuroimaging in Headache Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ye Eun Jang, Eun Young Cho, Hee Yea Choi, Sun Mi Kim, Hye Youn Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry investigation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ye Eun JangDepartment of Psychiatry, Seoul National University of Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Eun Young ChoDepartment of Biostatistics, Korea University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hee Yea ChoiDepartment of Psychiatry, Seoul National University of Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Sun Mi KimDepartment of Psychiatry, Chung-Ang University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hye Youn ParkDepartment of Psychiatry, Seoul National University of Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development InstituteMinistry of Health and Welfare HC17C0117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNeuroimaging in headache patients identifies clinically significant neurological abnormalities and plays an important role in excluding secondary headache diagnoses. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing guidelines and studies surrounding neuroimaging in headache patients.

methodsThe research question involved determining the prevalence of detecting clinically significant neurological abnormalities using neuroimaging in patients suspected of primary headache. Searches of the PubMed and Embase databases were conducted on English-language studies published from 1991 to 2016, and the reference lists of the retrieved articles were also checked manually. All headache subtypes and patients aged ≥15 years were included in the analysis.

resultsTen studies met the selection criteria. The pooled prevalence of detecting clinically significant abnormalities in the neuroimaging of headache patients was 8.86% (95% confidence interval: 5.12-15.33%). Subsequently, diverse subgroup analyses were performed based on the detection method, headache type, study type, study region, age group, and disease type.

conclusionThe present findings indicate that limited neuroimaging methods should be carefully considered for headache diagnostic purposes when there are red flag symptoms. Limitations and suggested directions for future studies on neuroimaging in headache patients are described.

Indexed as

HeadacheMagnetic resonance imagingNeuroimagingX-ray computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID31247699
PMCPMC6603699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.