ArticlePsychiatry investigation2019
Diagnostic Neuroimaging in Headache Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Psychiatry investigation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emergency MRI in acute dizziness and headache: current insights and future directions.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Medication-Overuse Headache: Update on Management.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Performance of an Open-Source Large Language Model in Extracting Information from Free-Text Radiology Reports.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Article
- Diagnostic yield of emergency MRI in non-traumatic headache.Neuroradiology · 2023Article
- The association between headache presentation, normal examination and neuroimaging findings: a retrospective analysis of patients presenting to a tertiary referral centre.African health sciences · 2022Article
- Isolated headache is not a reliable indicator for brain cancer: the 2-week wait pathway for suspected CNS malignancies.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2021Article
- Navigating migraine care through the COVID-19 pandemic: an update.Journal of neurology · 2021Article
- MRI Findings in Children with Headache Seen in a Third-Level Centre.Psychiatry investigation · 2019Article
- Isolated Cortical Vein Thrombosis in a Young Woman on Transdermal Ethinyl Estradiol: Case Report and Literature Review.AACE endocrinology and diabetesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveNeuroimaging in headache patients identifies clinically significant neurological abnormalities and plays an important role in excluding secondary headache diagnoses. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing guidelines and studies surrounding neuroimaging in headache patients.
methodsThe research question involved determining the prevalence of detecting clinically significant neurological abnormalities using neuroimaging in patients suspected of primary headache. Searches of the PubMed and Embase databases were conducted on English-language studies published from 1991 to 2016, and the reference lists of the retrieved articles were also checked manually. All headache subtypes and patients aged ≥15 years were included in the analysis.
resultsTen studies met the selection criteria. The pooled prevalence of detecting clinically significant abnormalities in the neuroimaging of headache patients was 8.86% (95% confidence interval: 5.12-15.33%). Subsequently, diverse subgroup analyses were performed based on the detection method, headache type, study type, study region, age group, and disease type.
conclusionThe present findings indicate that limited neuroimaging methods should be carefully considered for headache diagnostic purposes when there are red flag symptoms. Limitations and suggested directions for future studies on neuroimaging in headache patients are described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.