Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31247668›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2019

Interest In and Practices Related to Gynecologic Oncology among Members of the Brazilian Federation of Associations of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Arilto Eleutério da Silva Júnior, Jesus Paula Carvalho, Sophie Françoise Mauricette Derchain, Angélica Nogueira Rodrigues, Renato Moretti, Eduardo Batista Cândido, Ricardo Dos Reis, Aline Evangelista Santiago, Agnaldo Lopes da Silva Filho

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Arilto Eleutério da Silva JúniorDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho," Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Jesus Paula CarvalhoDepartment of Obstetrics, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Sophie Françoise Mauricette DerchainDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Angélica Nogueira RodriguesDepartment of Gynecology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Renato MorettiCenter of Oncology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Eduardo Batista CândidoDepartment of Gynecology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Ricardo Dos ReisDepartment of Oncology Gynecology, Hospital de Amor de Barretos, Barretos, SP, Brazil.
Aline Evangelista SantiagoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho," Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Agnaldo Lopes da Silva FilhoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho," Botucatu, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8486-7861
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRHospital de Câncer de Barretos · BRHospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present study aims to obtain basic demographic information, the level of interest and of training in gynecology oncology among Brazilian obstetricians and gynecologists (OB-GYNs) to create a professional profile.

methodsAn online questionnaire was sent to 16,008 gynecologists affiliated to the Brazilian Federation of Associations of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FEBRASGO, in the Portuguese acronym). We considered gynecologists dedicated to gynecologic oncology (OB-GYNs ONCO) those who self-reported that > 50% of their daily practice consists in working with women's cancer care.

resultsA total of 1,608 (10%) of 16,008 FEBRASGO members responded. The OB-GYNs are concentrated in the southern and southeastern states of Brazil. Gynecologic oncology was considered the 8

conclusionThe role of OB-GYNs and of OB-GYNs ONCO appears to be complementary. Obstetricians and gynecologists act more often in screening and prevention and in low-complexity surgical procedures, whereas OB-GYNs ONCO are more involved in highly complex cases. Strategies to raise standards in cancer training and to encourage the recognition of gynecologic oncology as a subspecialty should be adopted in Brazil.

Indexed as

GynecologyObstetricsAdvisory CommitteesAttitude of Health PersonnelBrazilCareer ChoiceEarly Detection of CancerGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansMedical OncologySpecialization

Identifiers

PMID31247668
PMCPMC10316826
OpenAlexW2955922882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.