ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2019
Automatic pedicle screw planning using atlas-based registration of anatomy and reference trajectories.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Statistical shape modelling of the human lumbar spine: a scoping review characterising the research landscape and potential clinical applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Pooled it
- A comprehensive framework for planning pedicle screw trajectory using ANTs template-based registration approach.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Agreement Between Automated Pedicle Screw Planning and Surgeon-Selected Implant Dimensions in Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Three-Year Single-Center Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Investigating robot control policy learning for autonomous x-ray-guided spine procedures.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- 3D path planning for robot-assisted vertebroplasty from arbitrary Bi-plane X-ray via differentiable rendering.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026Article
- Feasibility of automatic screw planning via transformer-based shape completion from RGB-D imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Robot-Assisted Reduction of the Ankle Joint via Multi-Body 3D-2D Image Registration.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2024Article
- Development and Validation of Deep Learning Preoperative Planning Software for Automatic Lumbosacral Screw Selection Using Computed Tomography.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Automatic Planning Tools for Lumbar Pedicle Screws: Comparison and Validation of Planning Accuracy for Self-Derived Deep-Learning-Based and Commercial Atlas-Based Approaches.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Performance evaluation of an AI-based preoperative planning software application for automatic selection of pedicle screws based on computed tomography images.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- The accuracy and effectiveness of automatic pedicle screw trajectory planning based on computer tomography values: an in vitro osteoporosis model study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Surgical data science - from concepts toward clinical translation.Medical image analysis · 2022Review
- Discussion on the possibility of multi-layer intelligent technologies to achieve the best recover of musculoskeletal injuries: Smart materials, variable structures, and intelligent therapeutic planning.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- CBCT-based synthetic CT generation using generative adversarial networks with disentangled representation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Review
- New spinal robotic technologies.Frontiers of medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An algorithm for automatic spinal pedicle screw planning is reported and evaluated in simulation and first clinical studies. A statistical atlas of the lumbar spine (N = 40 members) was constructed for active shape model (ASM) registration of target vertebrae to an unsegmented patient CT. The atlas was augmented to include 'reference' trajectories through the pedicles as defined by a spinal neurosurgeon. Following ASM registration, the trajectories are transformed to the patient CT and accumulated to define a patient-specific screw trajectory, diameter, and length. The algorithm was evaluated in leave-one-out analysis (N = 40 members) and for the first time in a clinical study (N = 5 patients undergoing cone-beam CT (CBCT) guided spine surgery), and in simulated low-dose CBCT images. ASM registration achieved (2.0 ± 0.5) mm root-mean-square-error (RMSE) in surface registration in 96% of cases, with outliers owing to limitations in CT image quality (high noise/slice thickness). Trajectory centerlines were conformant to the pedicle in 95% of cases. For all non-breaching trajectories, automatically defined screw diameter and length were similarly conformant to the pedicle and vertebral body (98.7%, Grade A/B). The algorithm performed similarly in CBCT clinical studies (93% centerline and screw conformance) and was consistent at the lowest dose levels tested. Average runtime in planning five-level (lumbar) bilateral screws (ten trajectories) was (312.1 ± 104.0) s. The runtime per level for ASM registration was (41.2 ± 39.9) s, and the runtime per trajectory was (4.1 ± 0.8) s, suggesting a runtime of ~(45.3 ± 39.9) s with a more fully parallelized implementation. The algorithm demonstrated accurate, automatic definition of pedicle screw trajectories, diameter, and length in CT images of the spine without segmentation. The studies support translation to clinical studies in free-hand or robot-assisted spine surgery, quality assurance, and data analytics in which fast trajectory definition is a benefit to workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.