Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31247607›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2019

Automatic pedicle screw planning using atlas-based registration of anatomy and reference trajectories.

R Vijayan, T De Silva, R Han, X Zhang, A Uneri, S Doerr, M Ketcha, A Perdomo-Pantoja, N Theodore, J H Siewerdsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A comprehensive framework for planning pedicle screw trajectory using ANTs template-based registration approach.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Investigating robot control policy learning for autonomous x-ray-guided spine procedures.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Robot-Assisted Reduction of the Ankle Joint via Multi-Body 3D-2D Image Registration.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery.Annals of translational medicine · 2021
    Review
  17. New spinal robotic technologies.Frontiers of medicine · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

R VijayanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4132-0783
T De SilvaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
R HanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
X ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
A UneriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3419-1805
S DoerrDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
M KetchaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
A Perdomo-PantojaDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4981-8132
N TheodoreDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
J H SiewerdsenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.

Funding

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007057 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KANOLD, PATRICK O, KARCHIN, RACHEL · 1985 to 2023
$10.4M
Intraoperative Imaging for Guidance, Patient Safety, and OR Quality AssuranceR01EB017226 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SIEWERDSEN, JEFFREY H · 2014 to 2017
$2.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017226NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An algorithm for automatic spinal pedicle screw planning is reported and evaluated in simulation and first clinical studies. A statistical atlas of the lumbar spine (N  =  40 members) was constructed for active shape model (ASM) registration of target vertebrae to an unsegmented patient CT. The atlas was augmented to include 'reference' trajectories through the pedicles as defined by a spinal neurosurgeon. Following ASM registration, the trajectories are transformed to the patient CT and accumulated to define a patient-specific screw trajectory, diameter, and length. The algorithm was evaluated in leave-one-out analysis (N  =  40 members) and for the first time in a clinical study (N  =  5 patients undergoing cone-beam CT (CBCT) guided spine surgery), and in simulated low-dose CBCT images. ASM registration achieved (2.0  ±  0.5) mm root-mean-square-error (RMSE) in surface registration in 96% of cases, with outliers owing to limitations in CT image quality (high noise/slice thickness). Trajectory centerlines were conformant to the pedicle in 95% of cases. For all non-breaching trajectories, automatically defined screw diameter and length were similarly conformant to the pedicle and vertebral body (98.7%, Grade A/B). The algorithm performed similarly in CBCT clinical studies (93% centerline and screw conformance) and was consistent at the lowest dose levels tested. Average runtime in planning five-level (lumbar) bilateral screws (ten trajectories) was (312.1  ±  104.0) s. The runtime per level for ASM registration was (41.2  ±  39.9) s, and the runtime per trajectory was (4.1  ±  0.8) s, suggesting a runtime of ~(45.3  ±  39.9) s with a more fully parallelized implementation. The algorithm demonstrated accurate, automatic definition of pedicle screw trajectories, diameter, and length in CT images of the spine without segmentation. The studies support translation to clinical studies in free-hand or robot-assisted spine surgery, quality assurance, and data analytics in which fast trajectory definition is a benefit to workflow.

Indexed as

Pedicle ScrewsAlgorithmsCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleReference StandardsSurgery, Computer-AssistedTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID31247607
PMCPMC8650759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.