Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31247044›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Human exposure to uranium in South African gold mining areas using barber-based hair sampling.

Frank Winde, Gerhard Geipel, Carolina Espina, Joachim Schüz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Environmental exposure to uranium in a population living in close proximity to gold mine tailings in South Africa.Journal of trace elements in medicine and biology : organ of the Society for Minerals and Trace Elements (GMS) · 2023
    Article
  6. Radiation-related health hazards to uranium miners.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Frank WindeNorth-West University, Vaal Triangle Campus, Research Unit Environmental Science and Management, Mine Water Re-Search Group, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-8537-3126
Gerhard GeipelHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute for Resource Ecology, Dresden, Germany.
Carolina EspinaInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Section of Environment and Radiation, Lyon, France.
Joachim SchüzInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Section of Environment and Radiation, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9687-2134
Centre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf · DEVaal University of Technology · ZA

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uranium (U) measurements in water, soil, and food related to gold mining activities in populated areas in Gauteng Province, South Africa, suggest the possibility of exposure levels that may lead to adverse health consequences, including cancer. Theoretical considerations on pathways of human uptake of significant exposures are plausible, but few data on directly measured human exposure are available. A cross-sectional study was conducted using human measurements to compare U levels with other settings around the globe (based on literature review), to explore potential exposure variability within the province, and to test the feasibility of recruiting subjects partially coming from vulnerable and difficult-to-reach populations. Wards of potentially high (HE) and low exposure (LE) were identified. Composite hair samples representing the respective local populations were collected from regular customers of selected barber shops over a period of 1-2 months. A total of 70 U concentrations were determined in 27 composite samples from 1332 individuals. U concentrations ranged from 31 μg/kg to 2524 μg/kg, with an arithmetic mean of 192 μg/kg (standard deviation, 310 μg/kg) and a median of 122 μg/kg. Although HE wards collectively showed higher U levels than LE wards (184 vs 134 μg/kg), differences were smaller than expected. In conclusion, detected U levels were higher than those from most other surveys of the general public. The barber-based approach was an efficient hair collection approach. Composite hair samples are not recommended, due to technical challenges in measuring U, and individual hair samples are needed in follow-up studies to determine predictors of exposure.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesEnvironmental MonitoringFeasibility StudiesFemaleGoldHairHumansMaleMiningSouth AfricaUraniumGoldUranium

Identifiers

PMID31247044
PMCPMC6597193
OpenAlexW2954482193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.