Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31246953›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

How many days are needed to estimate wrist-worn accelerometry-assessed physical activity during the second trimester in pregnancy?

Shana Ginar da Silva, Kelly R Evenson, Ulf Ekelund, Inácio Crochemore Mohsam da Silva, Marlos Rodrigues Domingues, Bruna Gonçalves Cordeiro da Silva, Márcio de Almeida Mendes, Gloria Isabel Niño Cruz, Pedro Curi Hallal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Physical Activity during Pregnancy and Newborn Body Composition: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Physical Activity Fragmentation and Falls in Older Adults: Findings From the National Health and Aging Trends Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shana Ginar da SilvaPostGraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1504-6936
Kelly R EvensonDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Ulf EkelundDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Inácio Crochemore Mohsam da SilvaPostGraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Marlos Rodrigues DominguesPostGraduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Bruna Gonçalves Cordeiro da SilvaPostGraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Márcio de Almeida MendesPostGraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5590-5750
Gloria Isabel Niño CruzPostGraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4951-5991
Pedro Curi HallalPostGraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 095582/Z/11/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObjective methods to measure physical activity (PA) can lead to better cross-cultural comparisons, monitoring temporal PA trends, and measuring the effect of interventions. However, when applying this technology in field-work, the accelerometer data processing is prone to methodological issues. One of the most challenging issues relates to standardizing total wear time to provide reliable data across participants. It is generally accepted that at least 4 complete days of accelerometer wear represent a week for adults. It is not known if this same assumption holds true for pregnant women.

aimWe assessed the optimal number of days needed to obtain reliable estimates of overall PA and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) during the 2nd trimester in pregnancy using a raw triaxial wrist-worn accelerometer.

methodsCross-sectional analyses were carried out in the antenatal wave of the 2015 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort Study. Participants wore the wrist ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometer for seven consecutive days. The daily average acceleration, which indicated overall PA, was measured as milli-g (mg), and time spent in MVPA (minutes/day) was analyzed in 5-minute bouts. ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare variability across days of the week. Bland-Altman plots and the Spearman-Brown Prophecy Formula were applied to determine the reliability coefficient associated with one to seven days of measurement.

resultsAmong 2,082 pregnant women who wore the accelerometer for seven complete days, overall and MVPA were lower on Sundays compared to other days of the week. Reliability of > = 0.80 to evaluate overall PA was reached with at least three monitoring days, whereas seven days were needed to estimate reliable measures of MVPA.

conclusionsOur findings indicate that obtaining one week of accelerometry in adults is appropriate for pregnant women, particularly to obtain differences on weekend days and reliably estimate overall PA and MVPA.

Indexed as

ExerciseAccelerometryAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, SecondReproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsWrist JointYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31246953
PMCPMC6597041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.