Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31246947›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

High-quality, genome-wide SNP genotypic data for pedigreed germplasm of the diploid outbreeding species apple, peach, and sweet cherry through a common workflow.

Stijn Vanderzande, Nicholas P Howard, Lichun Cai, Cassia Da Silva Linge, Laima Antanaviciute, Marco C A M Bink, Johannes W Kruisselbrink, Nahla Bassil, Ksenija Gasic, Amy Iezzoni and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
25.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Unlocking the future of crop improvement with crop wild relatives.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genetic architecture of cherry leaf spot (Horticulture research · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genome-wide association analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Stijn VanderzandeDepartment of Horticulture, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7206-7421
Nicholas P HowardDepartment of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, United States of America.
Lichun CaiDepartment of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.
Cassia Da Silva LingeDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States of America.
Laima AntanaviciuteDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States of America.
Marco C A M BinkBiometris, Wageningen UR, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Johannes W KruisselbrinkBiometris, Wageningen UR, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Nahla BassilUSDA-ARS, National Clonal Germplasm Repository, Corvallis, OR, United States of America.
Ksenija GasicDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States of America.
Amy IezzoniDepartment of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.
Eric Van de WegPlant Breeding, Wageningen UR, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Cameron PeaceDepartment of Horticulture, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0706-1108
Clemson University · USMichigan State University · USWashington State University · USCarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DEHendrix Genetics (Netherlands) · NLNational Clonal Germplasm Repository · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-quality genotypic data is a requirement for many genetic analyses. For any crop, errors in genotype calls, phasing of markers, linkage maps, pedigree records, and unnoticed variation in ploidy levels can lead to spurious marker-locus-trait associations and incorrect origin assignment of alleles to individuals. High-throughput genotyping requires automated scoring, as manual inspection of thousands of scored loci is too time-consuming. However, automated SNP scoring can result in errors that should be corrected to ensure recorded genotypic data are accurate and thereby ensure confidence in downstream genetic analyses. To enable quick identification of errors in a large genotypic data set, we have developed a comprehensive workflow. This multiple-step workflow is based on inheritance principles and on removal of markers and individuals that do not follow these principles, as demonstrated here for apple, peach, and sweet cherry. Genotypic data was obtained on pedigreed germplasm using 6-9K SNP arrays for each crop and a subset of well-performing SNPs was created using ASSIsT. Use of correct (and corrected) pedigree records readily identified violations of simple inheritance principles in the genotypic data, streamlined with FlexQTL software. Retained SNPs were grouped into haploblocks to increase the information content of single alleles and reduce computational power needed in downstream genetic analyses. Haploblock borders were defined by recombination locations detected in ancestral generations of cultivars and selections. Another round of inheritance-checking was conducted, for haploblock alleles (i.e., haplotypes). High-quality genotypic data sets were created using this workflow for pedigreed collections representing the U.S. breeding germplasm of apple, peach, and sweet cherry evaluated within the RosBREED project. These data sets contain 3855, 4005, and 1617 SNPs spread over 932, 103, and 196 haploblocks in apple, peach, and sweet cherry, respectively. The highly curated phased SNP and haplotype data sets, as well as the raw iScan data, of germplasm in the apple, peach, and sweet cherry Crop Reference Sets is available through the Genome Database for Rosaceae.

Indexed as

GenotypeWorkflowBreedingDatabases, GeneticDiploidyGenome, PlantHaplotypesMalusPedigreePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrunus aviumPrunus persicaRosaceaeSeed BankSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID31246947
PMCPMC6597046
OpenAlexW2953549877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.