Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31246593›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational gastroenterology2019

Clinical Potential of Circulating Tumor Cells in Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Study.

Dong Hoon Baek, Gwang Ha Kim, Geun Am Song, In Sub Han, Eun Young Park, Hyun Sung Kim, Hong Jae Jo, Sang Hwa Ko, Do Youn Park, Yoon-Kyung Cho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Technologies for Viable Circulating Tumor Cell Isolation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Circulating tumor cells in colorectal cancer in the era of precision medicine.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dong Hoon BaekDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Gwang Ha KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Geun Am SongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
In Sub HanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Eun Young ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Hyun Sung KimDepartment of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, South Korea.
Hong Jae JoDepartment of Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Sang Hwa KoDepartment of Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Do Youn ParkDepartment of Pathology, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Yoon-Kyung ChoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCirculating tumor cells (CTCs) in the blood have been used as diagnostic markers in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study, we evaluated a CTC detection system based on cell size to assess CTCs and their potential as early diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for CRC.

methodsFrom 2014 to 2015, 88 patients with newly diagnosed CRC, who were scheduled for surgery, and 31 healthy volunteers were enrolled and followed up in Pusan National University Hospital. CTCs were enriched using a centrifugal microfluidic system with a new fluid-assisted separation technique (FAST) and detected by cytomorphological evaluation using fluorescence microscopy.

resultsTwo or more CTCs were detected using FAST in 74 patients and 3 healthy volunteers. The number of CTCs in the CRC group was significantly higher than that in the healthy volunteers (P < 0.001). When a receiver operating characteristic curve was created to differentiate patients with CRC from healthy volunteers, the sensitivity and specificity were almost optimized when the critical CTC value was 5/7.5 mL of blood. When this value was used, the sensitivity and specificity in differentiating patients with CRC from the healthy controls were 75% and 100%, respectively. In patients with CRC with ≥5 CTCs, vascular invasion was frequently identified (P = 0.035). All patients with stage IV were positive for CTCs. Patients with ≥5 CTCs showed a trend toward poor overall and progression-free survival. DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrated promising results with the use of FAST-based CTC detection for the early diagnosis and prognosis of CRC.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGlobal Burden of DiseaseHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID31246593
PMCPMC6708664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.