European Court of Justice delivers no justice to Europe on genome-edited crops.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Natural variation in Arabidopsis thaliana highlights a key role of glyoxalase I;2 in detoxifying glucose-derived reactive carbonyl species.BMC plant biology · 2025
   Article
2. The Jan Sjödin faba bean mutant collection: morphological and molecular characterization.Hereditas · 2024
   Article
3. Seven open questions in the futures of human genome editing.Futures · 2023
   Article
4. Recommendations for the Assessment of Potential Environmental Effects of Genome-Editing Applications in Plants in the EU.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
   Review
5. Improving abiotic stress tolerance of forage grasses - prospects of using genome editing.Frontiers in plant science · 2023
   Review
6. Ethical aspects of GMO regulation in the EU: Regulating new plant breeding techniques as GM has negative effects on sustainability, diversity and inclusion: Regulating new plant breeding techniques as GM has negative effects on sustainability, diversity and inclusion.EMBO reports · 2022
   Article
7. Classification of CRISPR/Cas system and its application in tomato breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
   Review
8. Regulatory approaches for genome edited agricultural plants in select countries and jurisdictions around the world.Transgenic research · 2021
   Review
9. Biosafety of Genome Editing Applications in Plant Breeding: Considerations for a Focused Case-Specific Risk Assessment in the EU.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2021
   Review
10. 5Gs for crop genetic improvement.Current opinion in plant biology · 2020
    Review
11. Genome editing with the CRISPR-Cas system: an art, ethics and global regulatory perspective.Plant biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
12. Improving nutritional quality of rice for human health.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2020
    Review
13. A SWEET solution to rice blight.Nature biotechnology · 2019
    Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as