ArticleRehabilitation psychology2019
Rey Tangled Line Test: A measure of processing speed in TBI.
Article in Rehabilitation psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveNeuropsychological assessment plays a key role in characterizing and detecting cognitive impairment after traumatic brain injury (TBI). The Rey Tangled Line Test (RTLT), an understudied neuropsychological assessment thought to be capable of detecting visual processing deficits, was examined to determine which cognitive abilities may contribute to performance on the test in participants with a history of TBI.
methodOne-hundred participants with a history of mild to severe TBI were administered a battery of neuropsychological tests assessing attention, executive functioning, memory, visual construction, motor functioning, and processing speed between 30 days and 5 years postinjury. An exploratory principal components analysis (PCA) was performed to determine which cognitive tests the RTLT was most highly associated with.
resultsNo difference in RTLT latency was present between mild and moderate/severe TBI. The PCA resulted in 5 factors. RTLT latency had a significant primary factor loading on the "processing speed" factor, and a secondary loading on the "motor" factor. Forty-two percent of participants had an impaired latency score.
conclusionsRTLT latency appears to measure processing speed, and likely aspects of motor functioning, in our sample. The RTLT may be useful as a rapid assessment in individuals with a history of TBI to detect cognitive deficit before initiating further cognitive testing or rehabilitation efforts. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.