Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31245973›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of ophthalmology2019

Comparison of Icare Pro Tonometry and Icare One Tonometry Measurements in Healthy Eyes

Hüseyin Mayalı, Çağlar Sarıgül, Emin Kurt, Özcan Rasim Kayıkçıoğlu, Süleyman Sami İlker

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hüseyin MayalıManisa Celal Bayar University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Manisa, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-3692-665X
Çağlar SarıgülManisa Celal Bayar University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Manisa, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-0854-0728
Emin KurtManisa Celal Bayar University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Manisa, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-9559-1944
Özcan Rasim KayıkçıoğluManisa Celal Bayar University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Manisa, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-9457-9871
Süleyman Sami İlkerManisa Celal Bayar University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Manisa, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-2585-4427
Manisa Celal Bayar University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Icare Pro tonometer used in clinical practice and the Icare One self-tonometer. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two eyes of 52 healthy, right-handed individuals with no prior intraocular surgery or ocular trauma, structural ocular pathology, or systemic disease were evaluated. IOP was first measured using the Icare Pro tonometer. The participants were then told how to use the Icare One tonometer and asked to measure their own IOP. The results were analyzed statistically using SPSS v.24. Results: Of the 52 healthy participants, 16 (30.7%) were male and 36 (69.3%) were female. Their mean age was 31.6±6.3 (23-47) years. Mean IOP measured with the Icare Pro was 17.10±6.2 (11.5-25.2) mmHg, and the mean self-measured IOP with Icare One was 14.01±3.4 (7-24) mmHg. When the two methods were compared using Levene’s t-test, there was a significant mean difference of -3.08±0.6 (95% confidence interval: -4.39 -1.78; p<0.001). Conclusion: In this study, there was a significant difference between the IOP measurements we made using the Icare Pro and the participants’ self-measured IOP using the Icare One, with the latter being relatively lower. This may be related to the fact that the participants were unfamiliar with using the Icare One. Although the Icare One is a promising tool for glaucoma patients to self-monitor their IOP, further studies are needed.

Indexed as

AdultEquipment DesignFemaleGlaucomaHealthy VolunteersHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsTonometry, OcularYoung AdultGlaucomaIcareintraocular pressuretonometry

Identifiers

PMID31245973
PMCPMC6624463
OpenAlexW2954649303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.