Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31245871›Full record

ReviewBioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology2019

Searching for Sympatric Speciation in the Genomic Era.

Emilie J Richards, Maria R Servedio, Christopher H Martin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sympatric Speciation of Tibetan Loaches (Ecology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. When islands collide: Divergence predicts outcomes of secondary contact during the fusion of Sulawesi's paleo-archipelago.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Scattered differentiation of unlinked loci across the genome underlines ecological divergence of the selfing grassProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Assortative mating and mate-choice contributes to the maintenance of a developmental dimorphism in Streblospio benedicti.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emilie J RichardsDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Maria R ServedioDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Christopher H MartinDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7989-9124

Funding

Discovery and functional analysis of novel candidate genes and variants underlying craniofacial diversification in Cyprinodon pupfishesR01DE027052 · NIDCR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Christopher Herbert Martin · 2018 to 2026
$3.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE027052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sympatric speciation illustrates how natural and sexual selection may create new species in isolation without geographic barriers. However, recent genomic reanalyses of classic examples of sympatric speciation reveal complex histories of secondary gene flow from outgroups into the radiation. In contrast, the rich theoretical literature on this process distinguishes among a diverse range of models based on simple genetic histories and different types of reproductive isolating barriers. Thus, there is a need to revisit how to connect theoretical models of sympatric speciation and their predictions to empirical case studies in the face of widespread gene flow. Here, theoretical differences among different types of sympatric speciation and speciation-with-gene-flow models are reviewed and summarized, and genomic analyses are proposed for distinguishing which models apply to case studies based on the timing and function of adaptive introgression. Investigating whether secondary gene flow contributed to reproductive isolation is necessary to test whether predictions of theory are ultimately borne out in nature.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationAnimalsCichlidsGene FlowSympatrycichlidsgene flowgenomicsintrogressionselectionsympatric speciation

Identifiers

PMID31245871
PMCPMC8175013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.