Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31245774›Full record

ArticlePlant direct2019

Developmental and transcriptional responses of maize to drought stress under field conditions.

Olga N Danilevskaya, GongXin Yu, Xin Meng, John Xu, Elizabeth Stephenson, Stacey Estrada, Sunita Chilakamarri, Gina Zastrow-Hayes, Shawn Thatcher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant direct, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genetic dissection of maize drought tolerance for trait improvement.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Olga N DanilevskayaDuPont Pioneer Johnston Iowa.
GongXin YuIowa Institute of Human Genetics University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa.
Xin MengSyngenta Crop US Slater Iowa.
John XuIndigo Agriculture Charlestown Massachusetts.
Elizabeth StephensonDuPont Pioneer Johnston Iowa.
Stacey EstradaUSDA ARS Plant Introduction Research Unit Ames Iowa.
Sunita ChilakamarriDuPont Pioneer Johnston Iowa.
Gina Zastrow-HayesDuPont Pioneer Johnston Iowa.
Shawn ThatcherDuPont Pioneer Johnston Iowa.
Pioneer Hi-Bred · USAgricultural Research Service · USMedical University of the Americas · KNSyngenta (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drought is a common abiotic stress which significantly limits global crop productivity. Maize is an important staple crop and its yield is determined by successful development of the female inflorescence, the ear. We investigated drought stress responses across several developmental stages of the maize B73 inbred line under field conditions. Drought suppressed plant growth, but had little impact on progression through developmental stages. While ear growth was suppressed by drought, the process of spikelet initiation was not significantly affected. Tassel growth was reduced to a lesser extent compared to the observed reduction in ear growth under stress. Parallel RNA-seq profiling of leaves, ears, and tassels at several developmental stages revealed tissue-specific differences in response to drought stress. High temperature fluctuation was an additional environmental factor that also likely influenced gene expression patterns in the field. Drought induced significant transcriptional changes in leaves and ears but only minor changes in the tassel. Additionally, more genes were drought responsive in ears compared to leaves over the course of drought treatment. Genes that control DNA replication, cell cycle, and cell division were significantly down-regulated in stressed ears, which was consistent with inhibition of ear growth under drought. Inflorescence meristem genes were affected by drought to a lesser degree which was consistent with the minimal impact of drought on spikelet initiation. In contrast, genes that are involved in floret and ovule development were sensitive to stress, which is consistent with the detrimental effect of drought on gynoecium development and kernel set.

Indexed as

abiotic stressdevelopmentdroughtmaizeRNA‐seq

Identifiers

PMID31245774
PMCPMC6589525
OpenAlexW2944442497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.