Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31245603›Full record

ArticleLearning health systems2019

Engaging patients, clinicians, and the community in a Clinical Data Research Network: Lessons learned from the CAPriCORN CDRN.

Ellen Tambor, Madeleine Shalowitz, Joseph M Harrington, Kevin Hull, Natalie Watson, Shelly Sital, Jennifer Al Naber, Doriane Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning health systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ellen TamborCenter for Medical Technology Policy Baltimore MD USA.
Madeleine ShalowitzHealth Services Research Northshore University HealthSystem Chicago IL USA.
Joseph M HarringtonCAPriCORN Patient and Community Advisory Committee Chicago IL USA.
Kevin HullWest Side Institute for Science and Education, at the Jesse Brown VA Medical Center Chicago IL USA.
Natalie WatsonCenter for Community Health and Vitality University of Chicago Medicine Chicago IL USA.
Shelly SitalChicago Area Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Network (CAPriCORN) Chicago IL USA.
Jennifer Al NaberCenter for Medical Technology Policy Baltimore MD USA.
Doriane MillerCenter for Community Health and Vitality University of Chicago Medicine Chicago IL USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engaging patients, clinicians, and community members in the development of a research network creates opportunities and challenges beyond engagement in discrete learning activities. This paper describes our experiences establishing and maintaining a stakeholder engagement infrastructure for the Chicago Area Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Network (CAPriCORN) and highlights important lessons learned over the first 4 years. During this time, the CAPriCORN Patient and Community Advisory Committee (PCAC) appointed patient, clinician, and community representatives to governance and advisory groups throughout the network, developed a process and criteria for patient- and clinician-centered review of research proposals, and evolved from a large, diverse group to a smaller yet still diverse, more actively engaged group with connections to the broader community. Key challenges faced by the PCAC have included determining the optimal size and composition of the group, understanding the complex structure of the network as a whole, coordinating with other network entities and functions, and integrating the patient and community voice into the research review process. Efforts to engage stakeholders in clinical data research networks should anticipate and develop solutions to address these challenges.

Indexed as

clinical data research networkcommunity engagementpatient‐centered outcomes researchstakeholder engagement

Identifiers

PMID31245603
PMCPMC6508783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.