Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31245585›Full record

ArticleLearning health systems2018

De facto diagnosis specialties: Recognition and discovery.

Aston Zhang, Xun Lu, Carl A Gunter, Shuochao Yao, Fangbo Tao, Rongda Zhu, Huan Gui, Daniel Fabbri, David Liebovitz, Bradley Malin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning health systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aston ZhangDepartment of Computer Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana Illinois.
Xun LuDepartment of Computer Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana Illinois.
Carl A GunterDepartment of Computer Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana Illinois.
Shuochao YaoDepartment of Computer Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana Illinois.
Fangbo TaoDepartment of Computer Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana Illinois.
Rongda ZhuDepartment of Computer Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana Illinois.
Huan GuiDepartment of Computer Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana Illinois.
Daniel FabbriDepartment of Biomedical Informatics Vanderbilt University Nashville Tennessee.
David LiebovitzDepartment of Medicine University of Chicago Chicago Illinois.
Bradley MalinDepartment of Biomedical Informatics Vanderbilt University Nashville Tennessee.

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000003 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FITZGERALD, GARRET A · 2012 to 2015
$38.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A medical specialty indicates the skills needed by health care providers to conduct key procedures or make critical judgments. However, documentation about specialties may be lacking or inaccurately specified in a health care institution. Thus, we propose to leverage diagnosis histories to recognize medical specialties that exist in practice. Such specialties that are highly recognizable through diagnosis histories are de facto diagnosis specialties. We aim to recognize de facto diagnosis specialties that are listed in the Health Care Provider Taxonomy Code Set (HPTCS) and discover those that are unlisted. First, to recognize the former, we use similarity and supervised learning models. Next, to discover de facto diagnosis specialties unlisted in the HPTCS, we introduce a general discovery-evaluation framework. In this framework, we use a semi-supervised learning model and an unsupervised learning model, from which the discovered specialties are subsequently evaluated by the similarity and supervised learning models used in recognition. To illustrate the potential for these approaches, we collect 2 data sets of 1 year of diagnosis histories from a large academic medical center: One is a subset of the other except for additional information useful for network analysis. The results indicate that 12 core de facto diagnosis specialties listed in the HPTCS are highly recognizable. Additionally, the semi-supervised learning model discovers a specialty for breast cancer on the smaller data set based on network analysis, while the unsupervised learning model confirms this discovery and suggests an additional specialty for

Indexed as

diagnosis specialtyelectronic health recordmachine learningmedical informatics

Identifiers

PMID31245585
PMCPMC6508768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.