Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31245568›Full record

ArticleLearning health systems2017

Requirements and validation of a prototype learning health system for clinical diagnosis.

Derek Corrigan, Gary Munnelly, Przemysław Kazienko, Tomasz Kajdanowicz, Jean-Karl Soler, Samhar Mahmoud, Talya Porat, Olga Kostopoulou, Vasa Curcin, Brendan Delaney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning health systems, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Referral Decision Making of General Practitioners: A Signal Detection Study.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Derek CorriganRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland Dublin Ireland.
Gary MunnellyTrinity College Dublin Dublin Ireland.
Przemysław KazienkoWrocław University of Science and Technology Wrocław Poland.
Tomasz KajdanowiczWrocław University of Science and Technology Wrocław Poland.
Jean-Karl SolerMediterranean Institute for Primary Care Malta.
Samhar MahmoudKings College London London UK.
Talya PoratKings College London London UK.
Olga KostopoulouImperial College London London UK.
Vasa CurcinKings College London London UK.
Brendan DelaneyImperial College London London UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3518-0131
King's College London · GBImperial College London · GBWrocław University of Science and Technology · PLMediterranean Institute for Advanced Studies · ESRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IETrinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDiagnostic error is a major threat to patient safety in the context of family practice. The patient safety implications are severe for both patient and clinician. Traditional approaches to diagnostic decision support have lacked broad acceptance for a number of well-documented reasons: poor integration with electronic health records and clinician workflow, static evidence that lacks transparency and trust, and use of proprietary technical standards hindering wider interoperability. The learning health system (LHS) provides a suitable infrastructure for development of a new breed of learning decision support tools. These tools exploit the potential for appropriate use of the growing volumes of aggregated sources of electronic health records.

methodsWe describe the experiences of the TRANSFoRm project developing a diagnostic decision support infrastructure consistent with the wider goals of the LHS. We describe an architecture that is model driven, service oriented, constructed using open standards, and supports evidence derived from electronic sources of patient data. We describe the architecture and implementation of 2 critical aspects for a successful LHS: the model representation and translation of clinical evidence into effective practice and the generation of curated clinical evidence that can be used to populate those models, thus closing the LHS loop. RESULTS/

conclusionsSix core design requirements for implementing a diagnostic LHS are identified and successfully implemented as part of this research work. A number of significant technical and policy challenges are identified for the LHS community to consider, and these are discussed in the context of evaluating this work: medico-legal responsibility for generated diagnostic evidence, developing trust in the LHS (particularly important from the perspective of decision support), and constraints imposed by clinical terminologies on evidence generation.

Indexed as

diagnostic decision support systemsknowledge discoveryknowledge representationlearning health systems

Identifiers

PMID31245568
PMCPMC6508515
OpenAlexW2617099375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.