ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2019
Regional Ultrahigh-Resolution Rescan in a Clinical Whole-Body CT Scanner Using a Contact Detector Insert.
Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Online Geometric Calibration of a Hybrid CT System for Ultrahigh-Resolution Imaging.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrahigh-resolution, low-dose rescans in a region of interest following a general screening computed tomography (CT) scan is motivated by the need to reduce invasive tissue biopsy procedures in cancer screening. We describe a new method to meet the conflicting demands of ultrahigh resolution, high-speed and ultralow-dose, and the first proof-of-concept experiment. With improving detector resolution, the limiting factor for the system resolution of whole-body CT scanners shifts to the penumbra of the source focal spot. The penumbra unsharpness is minimized by inserting flat-panel detector(s) that are in direct contact with the body. In the hybrid system, the detector insert and the CT detector acquire data simultaneously, whereby the standard CT images give the position and orientation of the detector insert(s) as needed for tomosynthesis reconstruction. Imaging tests were performed with a compact photon-counting detector insert on resolution targets of both high- and low-contrast as well as a mouse specimen, all inside a body phantom. Detector insert tomosynthesis provided twice the resolution of the CT scanner alone at the same dose concentration. The short 2-cm beam collimation of the tomosynthesis rescan gave an effective dose equivalent to 6% of an average CT scan in the chest or abdomen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.