ArticleRegenerative therapy2016
Compassionate use of drugs and medical devices in the United States, the European Union and Japan.
Article in Regenerative therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- 3D printing in palliative medicine: systematic review.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2024Pooled it
- A multi-method study of unlicensed medicine risk assessment: a cross-sectional survey of pharmacy procurement leads and policy analysis across NHS trusts in England.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Early and accelerated access programs for medical devices in the European Union: mapping regulatory derogations and national schemes.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Review
- A Qualitative Interview Study on Expanded Access Clinical Trials for Compassionate Use in Japan.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
- Benefit assessment of extended dosing in cancer patients after their withdrawal from clinical trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Characteristics of the Compassionate Use Program in Japan: An Analysis of Expanded Access Clinical Trials from 2016 to 2021.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2022Article
- International Country-Level Trends, Factors, and Disparities in Compassionate Use Access to Unlicensed Products for Patients With Serious Medical Conditions.JAMA health forum · 2022Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing of Medical Devices Used Directly to Treat Patients: A Systematic Review.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2021Review
- Regulatory brokerage: Competitive advantage and regulation in the field of regenerative medicine.Social studies of science · 2019Article
- Compassionate use and hospital exemption for regenerative medicine: Something wrong to apply the program for patients in a real world.Regenerative therapy · 2018Article
- Ethics review in compassionate use.BMC medicine · 2017Article
- Understanding the challenges and ethical aspects of compassionate use of drugs in emergency situations.Indian journal of pharmacologyArticle
- Compassionate drug use: Current status in India.Perspectives in clinical researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compassionate use, also called expanded access, provides an important pathway for patients with life-threatening conditions to gain access to unapproved investigational drugs, biologics and medical devices. Although the United States (US) and the countries of the Europe Union (EU) have mechanisms that are associated with the use of unapproved products, as of May 2015 there was no such mechanism in Japan. Instead, unapproved products are used under a physician's discretion in conjunction with the Japan Medical Practitioners' Act or Advanced Medical Care B. However, there are some issues and questions to consider under the current circumstances in Japan as follows: (A) it is difficult for the local regulator to monitor the use of unapproved products; (B) there is no information collected on the safety of these products to protect patients; (C) it is difficult to assure the quality of the products; (D) it is difficult for patients to obtain detailed information about unapproved products and their availability; and (E) it is not clear who should cover the cost of the unapproved products. In this paper, we assess the current compassionate use, or expanded access-related mechanisms, of the US, the EU and Japan in regard to drugs, medical devices and biologics, including human cells and tissue products, and discuss the benefits and issues of these mechanisms. The purpose of these mechanisms is principally to save patients with life-threatening condition. However, the information obtained after the compassionate use is potentially useful to facilitate marketing authorization. In fact, the data from compassionate use cases are employed in some approval review reports to indicate the product safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.