Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31245484›Full record

ArticleRegenerative therapy2016

Compassionate use of drugs and medical devices in the United States, the European Union and Japan.

Kenichiro Tsuyuki, Kazuo Yano, Natsumi Watanabe, Atsushi Aruga, Masayuki Yamato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. 3D printing in palliative medicine: systematic review.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Compassionate drug use: Current status in India.Perspectives in clinical research
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kenichiro TsuyukiCooperative Major in Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Joint Graduate School of Tokyo Women's Medical University and Waseda University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan.
Kazuo YanoCooperative Major in Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Joint Graduate School of Tokyo Women's Medical University and Waseda University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan.
Natsumi WatanabeCooperative Major in Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Joint Graduate School of Tokyo Women's Medical University and Waseda University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan.
Atsushi ArugaCooperative Major in Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Joint Graduate School of Tokyo Women's Medical University and Waseda University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan.
Masayuki YamatoCooperative Major in Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Joint Graduate School of Tokyo Women's Medical University and Waseda University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compassionate use, also called expanded access, provides an important pathway for patients with life-threatening conditions to gain access to unapproved investigational drugs, biologics and medical devices. Although the United States (US) and the countries of the Europe Union (EU) have mechanisms that are associated with the use of unapproved products, as of May 2015 there was no such mechanism in Japan. Instead, unapproved products are used under a physician's discretion in conjunction with the Japan Medical Practitioners' Act or Advanced Medical Care B. However, there are some issues and questions to consider under the current circumstances in Japan as follows: (A) it is difficult for the local regulator to monitor the use of unapproved products; (B) there is no information collected on the safety of these products to protect patients; (C) it is difficult to assure the quality of the products; (D) it is difficult for patients to obtain detailed information about unapproved products and their availability; and (E) it is not clear who should cover the cost of the unapproved products. In this paper, we assess the current compassionate use, or expanded access-related mechanisms, of the US, the EU and Japan in regard to drugs, medical devices and biologics, including human cells and tissue products, and discuss the benefits and issues of these mechanisms. The purpose of these mechanisms is principally to save patients with life-threatening condition. However, the information obtained after the compassionate use is potentially useful to facilitate marketing authorization. In fact, the data from compassionate use cases are employed in some approval review reports to indicate the product safety.

Indexed as

Clinical trialCompassionate useExpanded accessLife-threateningSerious diseaseUnapproved products

Identifiers

PMID31245484
PMCPMC6581800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.