Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31245474›Full record

ReviewRegenerative therapy2016

Biomaterial-engineering and neurobiological approaches for regenerating the injured cerebral cortex.

Itsuki Ajioka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Regenerative therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Itsuki AjiokaCenter for Brain Integration Research (CBIR), Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cerebral cortex is responsible for higher functions of the central nervous system (CNS), such as movement, sensation, and cognition. When the cerebral cortex is severely injured, these functions are irreversibly impaired. Although recent neurobiological studies reveal that the cortex has the potential for regeneration, therapies for functional recovery face some technological obstacles. Biomaterials have been used to evoke regenerative potential and promote regeneration in several tissues, including the CNS. This review presents a brief overview of new therapeutic strategies for cortical regeneration from the perspectives of neurobiology and biomaterial engineering, and discusses a promising technology for evoking the regenerative potential of the cerebral cortex.

Indexed as

BiomaterialsCell cycleCerebral cortexCNS, central nervous systemES, embryonic stemMSC, mesenchymal stem cellMZ, marginal zoneNSC, neural stem cellOB, olfactory bulbRegenerationV–SVZ, ventricular–subventricular zoneVZ, ventricular zone

Identifiers

PMID31245474
PMCPMC6581816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.