Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31245252›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in psychiatry2019

Brief novel therapies for PTSD: Written Exposure Therapy.

Johanna Thompson-Hollands, Brian P Marx, Denise M Sloan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johanna Thompson-HollandsNational Center for PTSD, Boston, MA.
Brian P MarxNational Center for PTSD, Boston, MA.
Denise M SloanNational Center for PTSD, Boston, MA.
Boston University · US

Funding

Written Exposure Therapy for PTSD: A Randomized Noninferiority TrialR01MH095737 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI SLOAN, DENISE M. · 2012 to 2016
$1.4M
An adjunctive family intervention for individual PTSD treatmentIK2CX001589 · VA · VA BOSTON HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI THOMPSON-HOLLANDS, JOHANNA · 2017 to 2021
–
CSRD VA IK2 CX001589NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWritten Exposure Therapy (WET) is a 5-session exposure-based intervention for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). WET was developed through a series of systematic evaluations of the expressive writing procedure. It is an efficient intervention, requiring limited patient and therapist time and no between-session assignments. The treatment results in statistically and clinically significant symptom change among individuals, including veterans, with PTSD. RECENT

findingsWET has been shown to be non-inferior to Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT), a more intensive form of PTSD treatment. Additionally, WET resulted in substantially lower rates of treatment dropout compared to CPT (6% versus 39%). Moderator analyses of the rate of symptom change during treatment indicated that WET performed equally well for participants regardless of age, gender, comorbid depression, or estimated full scale IQ. SUMMARY: WET represents a viable option for the efficacious, brief treatment of PTSD and may have significant strengths compared to other manualized psychotherapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

brief therapiescognitive-behavioral therapyPTSDtraumatreatment

Identifiers

PMID31245252
PMCPMC6594556
OpenAlexW2953299781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.