Article3 Biotech2019
Transcriptome-based analysis of carotenoid accumulation-related gene expression in petals of Chinese cabbage (
Article in 3 Biotech, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Selection and Validation of qRT-PCR Internal Reference Genes to Study Flower Color Formation inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Recent Advancements and Biotechnological Implications of Carotenoid Metabolism ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Investigation of genes associated with petal variations between diploid and autotetraploid in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis) by RNA-seq and sRNA-seq.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To identify genes associated with carotenoid accumulation in petals of Chinese cabbage, the composition and content of carotenoids were analyzed, and comparative transcriptome sequencing was performed between the yellow flower line, 92S105, and the orange flower line, 94C9. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) revealed that petals of 92S105 were high in violaxanthin as well as lutein, whereas petals of 94C9 showed considerable levels of lutein and β-carotene. Transcriptome analysis showed that 3534 and 3833 genes were up- and down-regulated in 94C9, respectively. Among these differentially expressed genes (DEGs), many related to carotenoid accumulation were identified, including 12 carotenoid biosynthesis pathway genes, 4 transcription factor genes, and 1028 specifically expressed genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.