ArticlePeerJ2019
An integration of deep learning with feature embedding for protein-protein interaction prediction.
Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning and Deep Learning Frameworks for Human-Virus Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction: Emerging Architectures, Methods, Benchmarks, and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- eSIG-Net: an interaction language model that decodes the protein code of single mutations.Nature methods · 2026Article
- eSIG-Net: Accurate prediction of single-mutation induced perturbations on protein interactions using a language model.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- DSS-PPI: a self-supervised graph learning framework for protein-protein interaction prediction via multimodal sequence semantics.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- An efficient framework for protein-protein interaction prediction by integrating stacked denoising autoencoders and random ferns.iScience · 2026Article
- Review
- Sequence-Based Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction and Its Applications in Drug Discovery.Cells · 2025Review
- Dual-protein embedding-based graph model with dynamic attention for interaction prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Sequence-only prediction of binding affinity changes: a robust and interpretable model for antibody engineering.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- ESM2_AMP: an interpretable framework for protein-protein interactions prediction and biological mechanism discovery.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Article
- PPILS: Protein-protein interaction prediction with language of biological coding.Computers in biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Predicting protein-protein interactions in microbes associated with cardiovascular diseases using deep denoising autoencoders and evolutionary information.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Unveiling the ghost: machine learning's impact on the landscape of virology.The Journal of general virology · 2025Review
- Challenges in predicting protein-protein interactions of understudied viruses: Arenavirus-human interactions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- SpatialPPI: Three-dimensional space protein-protein interaction prediction with AlphaFold Multimer.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Anti-symmetric framework for balanced learning of protein-protein interactions.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Guiding questions to avoid data leakage in biological machine learning applications.Nature methods · 2024Review
- Prediction of Protein-Protein Interactions Based on Integrating Deep Learning and Feature Fusion.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- AttABseq: an attention-based deep learning prediction method for antigen-antibody binding affinity changes based on protein sequences.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions are closely relevant to protein function and drug discovery. Hence, accurately identifying protein-protein interactions will help us to understand the underlying molecular mechanisms and significantly facilitate the drug discovery. However, the majority of existing computational methods for protein-protein interactions prediction are focused on the feature extraction and combination of features and there have been limited gains from the state-of-the-art models. In this work, a new residue representation method named Res2vec is designed for protein sequence representation. Residue representations obtained by Res2vec describe more precisely residue-residue interactions from raw sequence and supply more effective inputs for the downstream deep learning model. Combining effective feature embedding with powerful deep learning techniques, our method provides a general computational pipeline to infer protein-protein interactions, even when protein structure knowledge is entirely unknown. The proposed method DeepFE-PPI is evaluated on the S. Cerevisiae and human datasets. The experimental results show that DeepFE-PPI achieves 94.78% (accuracy), 92.99% (recall), 96.45% (precision), 89.62% (Matthew's correlation coefficient, MCC) and 98.71% (accuracy), 98.54% (recall), 98.77% (precision), 97.43% (MCC), respectively. In addition, we also evaluate the performance of DeepFE-PPI on five independent species datasets and all the results are superior to the existing methods. The comparisons show that DeepFE-PPI is capable of predicting protein-protein interactions by a novel residue representation method and a deep learning classification framework in an acceptable level of accuracy. The codes along with instructions to reproduce this work are available from https://github.com/xal2019/DeepFE-PPI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.