Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31245055›Full record

ArticleRMD open2019

Serious infection risk in rheumatoid arthritis compared with non-inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a US national cohort study.

Bella Mehta, Sofia Pedro, Gulsen Ozen, Andre Kalil, Frederick Wolfe, Ted Mikuls, Kaleb Michaud

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bella MehtaDepartment of Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4646-1446
Sofia PedroForward, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, Kansas, USA.
Gulsen OzenDepartment of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Andre KalilDepartment of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Frederick WolfeForward, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, Kansas, USA.
Ted MikulsDepartment of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Kaleb MichaudForward, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, Kansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5350-3934
The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USHospital for Special Surgery · US

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115458 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI GUDA, CHITTIBABU · 2016 to 2025
$42.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To identify serious infection (SI) risk by aetiology and site in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared with those with non-inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (NIRMD). Methods: Patients participating in FORWARD from 2001 to 2016 were assessed for SIs; defined by infections requiring hospitalisation, intravenous antibiotics or followed by death. SIs were categorised by aetiology and site. SI risk was assessed through Cox proportional hazards models. Best models were selected using machine learning Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) methodology. Results: Among 20 361 patients with RA and 6176 patients with NIRMD, 1600 and 276 first SIs were identified, respectively. Incidence of SIs was higher in RA compared with NIRMD (IRR = 1.5; 95% CI 1.2 to 1.5). The risk persisted after adjusting using the LASSO model (HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.5 to 1.8), but attenuated when additionally adjusted for glucocorticoid use (HR 1.3; 95% CI 1.2 to 1.5). SI risk was significantly higher in RA versus NIRMD for bacterial infections as well as for respiratory, skin, bone, joint, bloodstream infections and sepsis irrespective of glucocorticoid use. Compared with NIRMD, SI risk was significantly increased in patients with RA who were in moderate and high disease activity but was similar to those in low disease activity/remission (p trend < 0.001). Conclusions: The risk of all SIs, particularly bacterial, respiratory, bloodstream, sepsis, skin, bone and joint infections are significantly increased in patients with RA compared with patients with NIRMD. This infection risk appears to be greatest in those with higher RA disease activity.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArthritis, RheumatoidCohort StudiesComorbidityFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceInfectionsMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesOutcome Assessment, Health CarePublic Health SurveillanceRheumatic Diseasescohort studynon-inflammatory rheumatic diseaserheumatoid arthritisserious infection

Identifiers

PMID31245055
PMCPMC6560658
OpenAlexW2952164046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.